The US DOJ demands conduct remedies in the form of establishing firewalls and publishing non-discriminatory criteria before clearing the vertical merger between a satellite producer and a payload supplier (Northrop Grumman / TRW)

On December 11, 2002, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a proposed consent decree, permitting Northrop Grumman to proceed with its $7.8 billion acquisition of TRW. Northrop Grumman/TRW shows that the DOJ and the Department of Defense (DOD), which plays a leading role in reviewing defense industry transactions, continue to bring cases based on possible competitive issues from vertical consolidation in the defense industry. But, perhaps most notably, the agencies accepted unusually broad “behavioral” remedies to address competitive concerns. It is important to recognize, however, that the defense industry is unusual in several respects. Northrop Grumman/TRW should not be read to suggest that the antitrust agencies are likely to begin accepting similar far-reaching behavioral remedies

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • WilmerHale (Washington)
  • WilmerHale (Washington)
  • Stanford University
  • WilmerHale (Brussels)
  • WilmerHale (Washington)
  • Hughes Hubbard & Reed (Washington)
  • George Mason University

Quotation

James W. Lowe, Leon B. Greenfield, Douglas Melamed, Thomas Mueller, Ali Stoeppelwerth, Robert B. Bell, Veronica Kayne, The US DOJ demands conduct remedies in the form of establishing firewalls and publishing non-discriminatory criteria before clearing the vertical merger between a satellite producer and a payload supplier (Northrop Grumman / TRW), 10 June 2003, e-Competitions Bulletin June 2003, Art. N° 53268

Visites 40

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues