The EU Court of Justice states that the fact that a supplier in a dominant position applies to deliveries to one of his occasional customers in a period of shortage a rate of reduction different from his customers who have long-term contracts cannot amount to an abuse of a dominant position (Benzine en Petroleum)

Court of Justice, European

29 Jun 1978

The EU Court of Justice states that the fact that a supplier in a dominant position applies to deliveries to one of his occasional customers in a period of shortage a rate of reduction different from his customers who have long-term contracts cannot amount to an abuse of a dominant position (Benzine en Petroleum)

KEYWORDS

References

EU Court of Justice, Benzine en Petroleum, Case 77/77, 29 June 1978

EU Court of Justice, Benzine en Petroleum, Decision summary, 29 June 1978

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF 29 JUNE 1978 [1] Benzine en Petroleum Handelsmaatschappij BV and Others v Commission of the European Communities "Oil crisis" Case 77/77* 1. The absence of pecuniary sanctions

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

Author

European Court of Justice
European Court of Justice (Luxembourg)

Luxembourg 329 contributions 102584 visits

Quotation

European Court of Justice, The EU Court of Justice states that the fact that a supplier in a dominant position applies to deliveries to one of his occasional customers in a period of shortage a rate of reduction different from his customers who have long-term contracts cannot amount to an abuse of a dominant position (Benzine en Petroleum), 29 June 1978, e-Competitions June 1978, Art. N° 106844

Visites 63

All issues