The Ontario Superior Court of Justice holds the presumption that possession of documents, persons, or firms implies knowledge of their contents is unconstitutional in a criminal context (Marina Durward / Devon Group / Spearhead Management / TPG Technology Consulting)

Canadian Cartel News – Volume 5 – One Place Where Possession is not Nine Tenths of the Law* Section 69(2) of the Competition Act provides that, by possessing documents, persons and firms are deemed to know their contents and to have done what the documents say was done. Particularly in the era of terabytes of stored data, this is a nice little provision in the Crown’s arsenal in cartel prosecutions. On July 15, 2014, Justice Warkentin of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, in the case of R v Durward, determined that section 69(2) is not all it seems to be. Specifically, she ruled that section 69(2) of the Canadian Competition Act was not constitutional in the criminal context. The Durward case arose in the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

James Musgrove, Joshua Chad, The Ontario Superior Court of Justice holds the presumption that possession of documents, persons, or firms implies knowledge of their contents is unconstitutional in a criminal context (Marina Durward / Devon Group / Spearhead Management / TPG Technology Consulting), 15 July 2014, e-Competitions July 2014, Art. N° 70655

Visites 165

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues