The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit provides important clarification on "Competing Purchasers" for Robinson-Patman Act price discrimination claim (Sodexo, Feesers, Michael Foods )

On January 7, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in a 3-0 decision, reversed a district court's judgment against Sodexo, Inc., and another defendant in a Robinson-Patman Act (RPA) bench trial and directed entry of judgment in favor of the defendants. (Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc.; Sodexo, Inc., Nos. 09-2548, 09-2952, 09-2993.) Sodexo had retained Jones Day to handle the appeal following the adverse district court decision. The Third

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

Quotation

Kathryn M. Fenton, Thomas Demitrack, The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit provides important clarification on "Competing Purchasers" for Robinson-Patman Act price discrimination claim (Sodexo, Feesers, Michael Foods ), 7 January 2010, e-Competitions Bulletin January 2010, Art. N° 33754

Visites 477

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues