The Paris Court of Appeals sets the boundaries of the transmission of information from a criminal court (Le Foll / Colas Île de France Normandie / Ramery BTP / Gagneraud Construction)

I - Background Article L. 463-5 of the Commercial Code creates the possibility for the Competition Council to request documents closely linked to the facts referred to it and belonging to another national authority. The decision under examination is the first case where the Paris Appeal Court defines the boundaries of such procedure where a criminal Court is at stake [1]. In 1998, the Competition Council opened a case concerning several producers of concrete, suspected of market sharing in the frame of two public tenderings organised by the Department of Seine-Maritime and the French State. As a criminal procedure had also been previously triggered for the same facts, the permanent Commission of the Competition Council adopted a deliberation in July 2001, afterwards sent to the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Marie-Charlotte Rouzier, The Paris Court of Appeals sets the boundaries of the transmission of information from a criminal court (Le Foll / Colas Île de France Normandie / Ramery BTP / Gagneraud Construction), 30 January 2007, e-Competitions January 2007, Art. N° 13237

Visites 3696

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues