An overview of Romanian competition regime: Some substantive divergence with the EC competition legislation remain...

Competition Law n° 21/1996, Romanian Official Journal, Part.I, n° 88, 30 April 1996, with subsequent amendments and completions Romanian Competition Council (Consiliul Concurentei), 22 December 2004, Decision n° 329, Kronospan SA Consiliul Concurentei, Decizia n° 329/22.12.2004, referitoare la incalcarea art. 6 lit. a) din Legea concurentei nr. 21/1996, cu modificarile si completarile ulterioare, de catre SC Kronospan Sepal SA Sebes) Romanian Competition Council (Consiliul Concurentei), 26 May 2005, Decision n° 94, Lafarge Romcim S.A., Holcim (Romania) S.A. and Carpatcement Holding S.A. Consiliul Concurentei, Decizia n° 94/26.5/2005, privind sanctionarea societatilor comerciale Lafarge Romcim S.A., Holcim (Romania) S.A. si Carpatcement Holding S.A. pentru incalcarea art. 5 alin. 1,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Authors

  • Peli Filip (Bucharest)
  • Musat & Asociatii (Bucharest)

Quotation

Carmen Peli, Adrian Ster, An overview of Romanian competition regime: Some substantive divergence with the EC competition legislation remain..., 1 January 2007, e-Competitions Bulletin January 2007, Art. N° 13302

Visites 3644

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues