The Italian Antitrust Authority addresses the compatibility of certain distribution patterns common in the impulse ice-cream market (Sagit-Contratti Vendita e Distribuzione del Gelato)

KEYWORDS
References

Italian Competition Authority (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza del Mercato), 30 January 2003, decision n° 11662 of January 30th, 2003, Case I487, Sagit-Contratti Vendita e Distribuzione del Gelato

EU Competition Law Handbook n° I28

In two separate but related proceedings, the Italian Antitrust Authority ("IAA") addressed the compatibility of certain distribution patterns common in the Italian impulse ice-cream market, which often sees bars and restaurants being tied to the sale of a specific manufacturer 's brand and/or being imposed so-called "freezer exclusivity&" covenants (according to which bars and restaurants are required to use freezer cabinets supplied by a given manufacturer exclusively for the stocking of the latter's brand of ice-cream). A first decision, handed down in 1996, came to the conclusion that such

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Stefano Grassani, The Italian Antitrust Authority addresses the compatibility of certain distribution patterns common in the impulse ice-cream market (Sagit-Contratti Vendita e Distribuzione del Gelato), 30 January 2003, e-Competitions January 2003, Art. N° 26671

Visites 60

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues