In the recent Wood Fire Service case [1], the Italian Competition Authority (ICA) has found two anti-competitive agreements put in place by several players in the market for the provision of wood fire prevention services. The first anti-competitive agreement took the shape of a bid rigging practice that affected the competitive procedures organized between 2005 and 2018 to entrust the task of helicopter-firefighting services (the bid rigging practice). The second anti-competitive agreement consisted of the joint advanced determination of the fares for helicopter services (the price-fixing practice). Seven suppliers of helicopter services and one professional association were found guilty of having implemented the two anticompetitive agreements. The decision of the Italian Competition
The Italian Competition Authority finds two anti-competitive agreements in the market for the provision of fire prevention services (Wood Firefighting Services)
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers
Already Subscribed? Sign-in
Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.
Read one article for free
Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.