A U.S. Court of Appeals upholds that the theory of harm articulated by the FTC in hospital merger cases is fully applicable to physician acquisition cases and that the positive impact on competition of the claimed efficiencies must be clearly demonstrated (St. Luke’s Health System / Saltzer Medical)

“Oh help me, please doctor, I’m damaged” [1]—What does the Future Hold for Hospital-Physician Acquisitions?* With the ink still drying on the Ninth Circuit’s opinion affirming the Idaho federal district court’s order requiring St. Luke’s Health System to unwind its acquisition of Saltzer Medical Group—a for-profit, physician-owned, multi-specialty group comprising approximately 44 physicians located in Nampa, Idaho—you may ask what the decision means for other providers? Hospitals considering future acquisitions of physician groups,

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Jonathan L. Lewis, A U.S. Court of Appeals upholds that the theory of harm articulated by the FTC in hospital merger cases is fully applicable to physician acquisition cases and that the positive impact on competition of the claimed efficiencies must be clearly demonstrated (St. Luke’s Health System / Saltzer Medical), 10 February 2015, e-Competitions February 2015, Art. N° 71656

Visites 248

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues