The Regional Court of Dusseldorf rules on procedural key issues for cartel damages suits paving the way to de facto class action for cartel damages in Germany (Cartel Damage Claims)

I. Introduction The Regional Court in Düsseldorf has decided on procedural core questions in its interlocutory judgment of 21 February 2007 and already indicated its stance on substantive issues in an additional court instruction concerning the follow on-damages suit relating to the German cement cartel (see already S. Thomas, Damages claims under the revised German Act against restraints of competition (§ 33 Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen), e-Competitions, January 2007-I, n° 12706). The decisions are widely held to be a partial success for the claimant, because the court recognised the plaintiff's right to sue and favours a broad interpretation of the antitrust damages claim in § 33 Act against Restraints of Competition (ARC). However, a closer look reveals that civil antitrust

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen

Quotation

Stefan Thomas, The Regional Court of Dusseldorf rules on procedural key issues for cartel damages suits paving the way to de facto class action for cartel damages in Germany (Cartel Damage Claims), 21 February 2007, e-Competitions February 2007, Art. N° 13224

Visites 4837

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues