The US District Court for the District of Idaho denies a motion to dismiss an antitrust conspiracy claims of increasing prices and of price fixing despite the potato grower cooperatives asserting that the concerted action was permissible (Fresh and Process Potatoes)

POTATO PRICE-FIXING CASE SURVIVES MOTION TO DISMISS HOLDS THAT PRE-PRODUCTION AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT RESTRICTIONS ARE NOT EXEMPT UNDER CAPPER-VOLSTEAD* On December 2, 2011, a federal judge overseeing multidistrict litigation involving an alleged potato price-fixing conspiracy denied a motion to dismiss the antitrust conspiracy claims despite the potato grower cooperatives asserting that

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • McDermott Will & Emery (Washington)

Quotation

Gregory E. Heltzer, The US District Court for the District of Idaho denies a motion to dismiss an antitrust conspiracy claims of increasing prices and of price fixing despite the potato grower cooperatives asserting that the concerted action was permissible (Fresh and Process Potatoes), 2 December 2011, e-Competitions December 2011, Art. N° 93424

Visites 39

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues