The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal issues a decision which sets key considerations for market definition analysis (ComparetheMarket)

In a decision by the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) dated 19 November 2020, the CAT fined Comparethemarket (CTM), a price comparison website a fine of £17.9 million for abuse of dominance in the market for price comparison services. CTM abused its position in the market by imposing wide Most Favoured Nation (wMFN) clauses in agreements with 32 home insurance providers that advertised insurance services to customers on its platform. wMFN clauses also known as retail parity provisions operate as clauses which prohibit a supplier from quoting lower prices on other sales channels or websites, other than on the price comparison website it signed a wMFN clause with. In the context of home insurers as in this instant, wMFN clauses prevent a home insurance provider from pricing lower

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Concurrences (London)

Quotation

Temidayo Alade, The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal issues a decision which sets key considerations for market definition analysis (ComparetheMarket), 8 August 2022, e-Competitions August 2022, Art. N° 108812

Visites 108

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues