The EU Court of Justice confirms the strict approach to “by object” infringements resulting in the need to use effects analysis on more complex arrangements such as MIF agreements (Budapest Bank)

Drakakakis, Stamatis; Papaefthymiou, Argyris; Gavriilidou, Ellie

Previous article The EU Court of Justice emphasizes the need for a case and context-specific evaluation of ’by object’ restrictions and provides guidance on what sort of evidence is relevant, in a multilateral interchange fee credit card transaction (Budapest Bank) Next article The EU Court of Justice finds, following a preliminary reference, that certain interchange fees imposed by a bank payable on cross-border card transactions within the EEA are anticompetitive (Budapest Bank)

2 Apr 2020

The EU Court of Justice confirms the strict approach to “by object” infringements resulting in the need to use effects analysis on more complex arrangements such as MIF agreements (Budapest Bank)

KEYWORDS

Reference

EU Court of Justice, Budapest Bank, C‑228/18, 2 April 2020

On 2 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the EU delivered its judgment in Budapest Bank on a reference for a preliminary ruling from Hungary’s highest court relating to agreements on fixed multilateral interchange fees (MIFs). In this

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

PDF Version

Authors

Stamatis Drakakakis
Zepos & Yannopoulos (Athens)

Greece 33 contributions 2623 visits
Argyris Papaefthymiou
Zepos & Yannopoulos (Athens)

Greece 33 contributions 2186 visits
Ellie Gavriilidou
Zepos & Yannopoulos (Athens)

Greece 28 contributions 1702 visits

Quotation

Stamatis Drakakakis, Argyris Papaefthymiou, Ellie Gavriilidou, The EU Court of Justice confirms the strict approach to “by object” infringements resulting in the need to use effects analysis on more complex arrangements such as MIF agreements (Budapest Bank), 2 April 2020, e-Competitions April 2020, Art. N° 99944

Visites 59