The EU Court of Justice clarifies how to assess whether a practice of differential pricing by a dominant undertaking is capable of distorting competition on a downstream market (MEO - Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia)

Facts This preliminary ruling arose following a complaint lodged with the Portuguese Competition Authority by Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia SA (“MEO”) alleging that GDA, a non-profit-making collecting cooperative which manages the rights of artists and performers, had abused its dominant position on the market. The alleged abuse concerned, notably, discriminating in the amount of royalty which GDA charged MEO for its television broadcasting services compared to another customer. Legal issue The CJ was asked whether or not the concept of discriminatory pricing placing a trading partner at a ‘competitive disadvantage’, for the purposes of subparagraph (c) of the second paragraph of Article 102 TFEU, must be interpreted as requiring an analysis of the specific effects of the

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

Quotation

Philippe-Emmanuel Partsch, The EU Court of Justice clarifies how to assess whether a practice of differential pricing by a dominant undertaking is capable of distorting competition on a downstream market (MEO - Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia), 19 April 2018, e-Competitions Bulletin April 2018, Art. N° 86905

Visites 781

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues