The Irish High Court condemns several bookmakers for collective trade boycott (Dundalk Stadium)

Introduction On 19 February 2014, the Irish High Court ruled that a bookmaker operating at Dundalk racecourse did not have to pay an €8,000 capital contribution towards the redevelopment of the racecourse, under the “Pitch Rules” [1] applying to Dundalk racecourse. The dispute between the plaintiff, Mr Hyland, and the defendant racecourse raised issues of Irish constitutional law, the interpretation of the Pitch Rules, and competition law considerations. This article will focus mainly on the competition law elements of the case. The dispute arose out of the planned redevelopment of Dundalk racecourse into an all-weather race track, at a cost of €35m. Dundalk racecourse sought capital contributions of €8,000 from bookmakers towards the redevelopment, in return for the allocation of

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers

Already Subscribed? Sign-in

Access to this article is restricted to subscribers.

Read one article for free

Sign-up to read this article for free and discover our services.

 

PDF Version

Author

  • Ryanair (Dublin)

Quotation

Eoin Kealy, The Irish High Court condemns several bookmakers for collective trade boycott (Dundalk Stadium), 19 February 2014, e-Competitions February 2014, Art. N° 66151

Visites 225

All issues

  • Latest News issue 
  • All News issues
  • Latest Special issue 
  • All Special issues