Dr. Zhan Hao is the managing partner of AnJie Law Firm. He has played an important role in assisting a number of multinational companies and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in antitrust regulatory filings in China and has secured approvals for all the transactions he represented. His specialized area in antitrust filings are merger and acquisitions, joint-venture (JV) setups and contractual control involving a broad scope of sectors, including aviation, mining, pharmaceutical, oil, machinery, food, IT, vehicle etc. He has represented respondents in China’s first government investigation regarding price cartel and secured the suspension of the action. Furthermore, he has successfully represented clients in various antitrust and unfair competition litigations before the Chinese courts; some of the litigations involved both antitrust and intellectual property right issues, which is deemed to be the most complicated area compared to other antitrust litigations. Dr. Zhan Hao has authored a number of academic books on the Anti-Monopoly Law of the PRC (AML), which are published by LexisNexis and the Chinese leading legal press. So far, he is the only Chinese antitrust lawyer having both a PhD in law and extensive experience in post-doctor microeconomic research.
Distinctions
Dr. Zhan Hao is honored as Professional Insurance Lawyer by a number of ranking institutions as Chambers & Partners, Who is Who Legal, ALB and PLC. Currently, AnJie Insurance Department is the biggest, full-service and most influential insurance team among China law firms.
Supreme People’s Court releases interpretation of Anti-Unfair Competition Law*
On 17 March 2022, the Supreme People’s Court of China released the Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. The document, which took effect on 20 March 2022, (...)
Beijing AMR fines Geistlich Trading (Beijing) over monopoly agreement*
On 28 February 2022, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) published an administrative penalty decision against Geistlich Trading (Beijing) Co Ltd for engaging in monopoly agreements of resale price (...)
Highlights of the Chinese Leniency Guidelines Published by SAMR in June 2020*
In June 2020, the Anti-Monopoly Bureau of the State Administration for Market Regulation (“SAMR”) published a new book, the 2019 Compilation of Antitrust Regulations and Guidelines, which contains four previously (...)
Implications of China’s Antitrust Guidelines for the Automobile Sector on Regulation of Vertical Restraints*
The automobile industry has been under the radar of China’s antitrust enforcement for a number of years. Since 2014, the agency had successively issued fines against many players in the (...)
China’s supreme court enunciated the non-arbitrability of antitrust civil disputes*
For a few years, the topic of whether antitrust civil disputes could be arbitrable had been hotly debated in China. There were few precedents in connection with this issue for people to better understand what (...)
Chemical Giant Eastman is Slapped with a Fine for Abuse of Market Dominance in China*
China’s competition watchdog SAMR made a penalty decision, adopted by its Shanghai branch Shanghai Market Regulation Bureau (“SMRB”), publicized on its official website1 on April 29, 2019, right before the (...)
Warning from MOFCOM: Second Wave of Penalties Imposed for Breaches of Concentration Notification Rules*
On September 29th 2015, the Ministry of Commerce of the P.R.C (“MOFCOM”) published four administrative decisions on penalties for illegal activities involved in the concentration of (...)
Mercedes-Benz Fined for Price Fixing: Auto Industry at Stake
Event
On 23 April, 2015, the Jiangsu Price Bureau, which is the provincial branch of the NDRC, announced the punishment on its website and stated that it had imposed a fine of CNY 350 million (USD 56.49 million) on German premium (...)
Huawei vs. ZTE - The Advocate General Has Spoken*
Background
On April 5, 2013, the Landgericht Düsseldorf (a German regional court) referred a set of questions relating to injunctive relief over standard-essential patents (“SEPs”) to the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) in connection with a (...)
When the Antitrust Encounter the Internet: The Legal Battle between Qihoo 360 and Tencent Finally Comes to the End*
The outgoing year has witnessed the significantly increasing role of „Antitrust‟ and „Internet‟ played in China‟s economy. With the Supreme People‟s Court („SPC‟) ratified the original (...)
SAIC Moves Closer to Antitrust Rules for IP*
On June 11, 2014, China’s State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) released the latest draft of regulations designed to implement the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) with respect to intellectual property rights—Rules of the Administration of (...)
China Deregulates Pricing in Telecommunication Sector*
China has seen another far-reaching step towards deregulating the strictly regulated telecommunication sector. On May 9, 2014, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the P.R.C. (MIIT) and the National Development and Reform (...)
Last Hurdle for Merck’s Acquisition of AZ Electronics Removed: MOFCOM’s 23rd Conditional Clearance*
Following the antitrust watchdog in Germany, Japan, Taiwan and the United States, the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (MOFCOM) conditionally cleared Merck KGaA’s (Merck) (...)
China Issues New Insurance Merger Rules*
Level play ground, optimizing industry structure, promoting competitiveness, and enriching the risk management tool kit of the insurance institutes”, quoting a statement of CIRC posted on its website.
Promotion of Competition
CIRC’s partially relaxed (...)
A Rational Thinking on the Refusal to License Intellectual Property under China’s Antitrust Legal Framework*
1. Introduction
This article will address the perplexing issue of refusal to license a patent or copyright to other undertakings conducted by intellectual property proprietors under (...)
This article has been nominated for the 2014 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards.
Chinese Court’s Roadmap on Vertical Monopoly Analysis: Some Comments on the Final Judgment on Rainbow vs. Johnson & Johnson Case*
On August 1 2013, Shanghai (...)
On August 1 2013, Shanghai People’s High Court (the Court) handed down judgment on the first private antitrust action involving vertical agreements under the minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) clause of China’s Anti-monopoly Law (AML). The Court rescinded the judgment of the first instance (...)
Tencent Defeats Qihoo 360 in First Antitrust Litigation Involving Instant Messaging Services*
The simmering war between two Chinese giant internet companies Qihoo 360 Technology Co., Ltd. (Qihoo 360) and Tencent Inc. (Tencent) culminated in Qihoo 360 losing the first antitrust litigation (...)
NDRC Imposed the Penalty against LCD Panel Companies for Their Monopolistic Behavior*
China’s National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”) has imposed a heavy penalty of total RMB 353 million yuan against six companies for the monopolistic behavior of price-fixing on liquid crystal display (...)
The First Judicial Interpretation on the Anti-monopoly Private Litigation in China*
On 4th May, 2012, the People’s Supreme Court issued the Regulations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in relation to Trials of Monopoly Civil Disputes arising from Monopolistic Conducts (The (...)
Taiyuan Railway Bureau is Sued by Private Enterprises Alleged Monopoly*
On September 7th, 2011, an antitrust litigation against Taiyuan Railway Bureau was brought to Taiyuan Xinghualing Court on the ground that Taiyuan Railway Bureau violated Anti-monopoly Law and Unfair Competition Law of PRC (...)
The First Guideline For Reviewing Concentrations in China Was Freshly Baked*
With already more than 3 years of practice experience concerning antitrust review to concentrations, the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China in recent publicly announced its first set of guideline (...)
China and US move closer on antitrust collaboration*
On July 27 2011 China’s three anti-monopoly agencies - the Ministry of Commerce, the National Development and Reform Commission and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce - signed an antitrust and anti-monopoly memorandum of (...)
Nestlé’s Filing of Acquiring China’ Largest Listed Confectionery Company is Accepted*
A spokeswoman from the Ministry of Commerce publicly declared in the recent, that the Ministry has officially accepted the notification on Nestlé’s acquisition of Hsu Fu Chi. If the Ministry turns on the green (...)
Can companies avoid filing concentrations?*
When a merger, acquisition or joint venture is connected to the Chinese market and is treated as a concentration under China’s Anti-monopoly Law, a company’s first question to its lawyer is likely to be whether the transaction must be filed with the (...)
The Supreme Court Issued Judicial Interpretation on the Anti-monopoly Civil Procedure*
On April 25th, the Supreme Court issued Provisions On a Number of Issues Applicable to the Trial of Monopoly Civil Dispute Cases (the “Exposure Draft”) for public comments. Totalling 20 articles, this (...)
SAIC regulations signal greater anti-monopoly enforcement*
On November 29 2010 the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) promulgated one substantive regulation and one procedural regulation regarding pricerelated monopolies (for further details please see "NDRC issues new (...)
NDRC issues new anti-monopoly pricing regulations*
The end of 2010 leaves China’s anti-monopoly regulators with several matters to consider, resolve or improve. The anti-monopoly framework is still not well established and consumer rights issues have been badly neglected. End consumers remain (...)
Revised Unfair Competition Law responds to changing economy*
Introduction The Unfair Competition Law, which was enacted in 1993, has been described as the constitution of the market economy. However, China’s rapid social and economic development has given rise to new forms of unfair (...)
Market dominance and the Internet: new industry, new rules?*
China’s biggest encyclopaedia website, Hudong.com, has requested an anti-monopoly review of Baidu, the leading Chinese internet search engine. Hudong.com is asking the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) to fine (...)
Conditional approval for Novartis’s acquisition of Alcon*
Introduction The Ministry of Commerce’s Anti-monopoly Bureau approved Novartis’s acquisition of Alcon on August 13 2010, subject to conditions.(1) The ministry accepted the filing in respect of the acquisition on April 20 2010 and (...)
Divestiture Regulation: A Giant Leap in Chinese Concentration Review Regime*
On July 8th, MOFCOM (Ministry of Commerce of People’s Republic of China) released The Provisional Rules on Implementing Divestiture of Assets or Businesses(“Provisional Rules”). This legislative move can be seen as (...)
China’s Leniency Program Taking a Hazy Shape*
Leniency program is an effective tool in exposing cartels. This has been confirmed by over 20 antitrust jurisdictions having leniency program around the world. China joined the club on August 1, 2008, when the Anti-Monopoly Law of PRC (“AML”) came (...)
A Look At the New Rule On Financial Integrated Operation: From the Perspective of Competition Law*
On November 26, 2009, China’s Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) issued the Pilot Administrative Measures for Commercial Banks to Make Equity Investment in Insurance Companies (the “Measures”). (...)
The Ending of the ’China Mobile’ Case*
This is an article corresponding to the China Mobile case which was discussed at China Law Vision on April 21, 2009. On 23 October 2009 the Beijing Dongcheng District People’s Court announced the settlement of an Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) case brought by Zhou (...)
In the first contribution, Angela Huyue Zhang analyses the way Chinese bureaucratic politics affect the outcome of antitrust enforcement in China. In the second contribution, Wei Tan and Hao Zhan adress the issue of private antitrust enforcement in China. According to the speakers, despite the (...)