Tinny Song

Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC (Washington)
Lawyer (Associate)

Tinny’s practice encompasses a variety of antitrust and competition matters including antitrust compliance, merger review, civil litigation, and government investigations. Tinny also assists clients with regulatory reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) assessing the national security implications of foreign investment transactions. Prior to joining Mintz, Tinny was an associate in the antitrust practice of a nationally recognized class action and litigation law firm in New York, where he represented clients in litigation involving price-fixing, benchmark and commodities manipulation, pay-for-delay, market allocation, and unlawful monopolization. He is a member of the ABA Antitrust Section’s Health Care & Pharmaceutical Committee and serves as an editor for the committee’s Health Care Antitrust Week-in-Review. During law school, Tinny was a research assistant at the Global Antitrust Institute in Arlington, Virginia and served as the associate articles editor for the George Mason Law Review. Tinny also attended “Competition Law in Brazil: Challenges and Perspectives” in Brasilia, Brazil where he studied Brazilian competition law and policy.

Linked authors

Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC (New York)
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC (Washington)
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC (Washington)
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC (Boston)

Articles

246 Bulletin

Joseph M. Miller, Michael T. Renaud, Richard M. Gervase Jr., Tinny Song The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rules that there is no antitrust violation in a multinational semiconductor company’s licensing of its standard-essential patents (Qualcomm)

246

Ninth Circuit Reverses FTC Win in FTC v. Qualcomm, Finding No Antitrust Violations from Qualcomm’s Licensing of its Standard-Essential Patents* In a reversal that came as no surprise to many observers, on Tuesday, August 11, 2020, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth (...)

Send a message