Soumya Hariharan

Trilegal (Mumbai)
Lawyer (Partner)

Soumya is a Partner in Trilegal’s competition law practise and is based out of Mumbai. She specialises in all aspects of competition law and regularly advises Indian and global companies in their most challenging competition law matters before the Competition Commission of India (CCI), including the office of the Director General (DG) and various Courts in India. Her multi-jurisdictional work experience includes working on competition law matters across India, Singapore and the ASEAN region. Soumya has been recognized as a Notable Practitioner in competition law in India by International Financial Law Review (IFLR) 1000, consecutively for the years 2020 and 2019.

Linked authors

Trilegal (Mumbai)
Trilegal (Bengalore)
Trilegal (Mumbai)

Articles

1899 Bulletin

Akrathi Shetty, Sakshi Agarwal, Soumya Hariharan The Indian Competition Authority finds four automotive and industrial bearing companies to have engaged in price-fixing and directs them to cease and desist from their collusive behaviour (Schaeffler / SKF / NEI / Tata)

118

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) recently found National Engineering Industries Ltd. (NEI), Schaeffler India Ltd. (Schaeffler), SKF India Ltd. (SKF) and Tata Steel Ltd., Bearing Division (Tata) (collectively, OPs) to have collusively fixed the prices of automotive and industrial (...)

Soumya Hariharan, Nandita Sahai, Sakshi Agarwal The Indian Competition Commission orders an investigation against online travel agencies for imposing vertical restrictions and abuse of dominance (MakeMyTrip / OYO)

781

Introduction The Federation of Hotel & Restaurant Associations of India (Informant), an association of hotels and restaurants in India, filed an Information with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against MakeMyTrip India Pvt. Ltd. (MMT), Ibibo Group Private Limited (GoIbibo), (...)

Sakshi Agarwal, Nandita Sahai, Soumya Hariharan The Competition Commission of India fines companies for bid rigging regarding a tender for the selection of an agency to carry-out tree census (Nagrik Chetna Manch / SAAR / CADD / Pentacle / Pune)

315

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) recently found that SAAR IT Resources Private Limited (OP 1), CADD Systems and Services Private Limited (OP 2) and Pentacle Consultants (I) Private Limited (OP 3), collusively manipulated the process of bidding, by rigging the bids for the tender (...)

Soumya Hariharan, Nandita Sahai, Sakshi Agarwal The High Court of Delhi holds that the absence of a judicial member does not invalidate proceeding and orders passed by the Competition Commission of India (Cadd)

414

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi (Delhi HC) recently held that orders passed and proceedings held by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in the absence of a judicial Member cannot be invalidated. This decision of the Delhi HC abundantly clarifies that orders passed by the CCI in competition (...)

592 Review

Send a message