Rohan Arora

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
Lawyer (Senior Associate)

Mr. Rohan Arora is a Senior Associate in the Firm’s Competition Law Practice. Rohan has been, and is currently involved in a number of high profile abuse of dominance enforcement cases with include India’s first case on predatory pricing before the Supreme Court of India. On the merger control side, he has been involved in various matters, including the acquisition of Alstom’s Power and Grid businesses by GE and the Indian aspects of the acquisition of H.J. Heinz Company by Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital. Rohan holds an LLB from Cardiff University, Wales, UK and an LLM in Competition Law from King’s College, London. His Masters thesis was supervised by Professor Richard Whish and was titled, “Show me the money: Follow-On Actions for Damages – The need for competition authorities to conduct an ‘effects-analysis’ for all anti-competitive agreements.

Linked authors

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (New Delhi)
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas (Mumbai)

Articles

635 Bulletin

Pallavi Shroff, John Handoll, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Harman Singh Sandhu, Manika Brar, Aparna Mehra, Gauri Chhabra, Yaman Verma, Rohan Arora The Competition Commission of India finds an association of medicine dealers has collected charges that are illegal under national competition law (Jalgaon District Medicine Dealers Association)

82

In a case against the Jalgaon District Medicine Dealers Association (Association), the CCI found that the Association had collected Product Information Service (PIS) charges from manufacturers of pharmaceutical products. The CCI found that payment of the PIS charges was mandatory and, (...)

Pallavi Shroff, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Rohan Arora, Gauri Chhabra, Yaman Verma, Aparna Mehra, Manika Brar, Harman Singh Sandhu, Naval Satarawala Chopra, John Handoll The Competition Commission of India finds the distribution arrangments of a supplier of mobile handsets to be prima facie compliant with national law (Vivo)

83

The CCI closed at prima facie stage a case against Vivo Mobile (Vivo), a supplier of mobile handsets, finding that its distribution arrangements raised no concerns under Section 3(4) of the Competition Act which prohibits vertical agreements with an appreciable adverse effect on competition (...)

Pallavi Shroff, John Handoll, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Harman Singh Sandhu, Manika Brar, Aparna Mehra, Gauri Chhabra, Yaman Verma, Rohan Arora The Indian Competition Commission finds that chemist associations and pharmaceutical companies had engaged in a system of no-objection certificates under which the associations prescribed which stockist could stock a company’s products

60

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) found that two chemist associations and two pharmaceutical companies had engaged in a system of no-objection certificates (NOC) under which the associations prescribed which stockist could stock a company’s products.1 The associations and certain of (...)

Pallavi Shroff, John Handoll, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Harman Singh Sandhu, Manika Brar, Aparna Mehra, Yaman Verma, Rohan Arora, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Gauri Chhabra The Competition Commission of India finds two chemist associations and two pharmaceutical companies to have used no-objection certificates (Madhya Pradesh Chemists)

23

India Competition Law Roundup: June 2019 The Competition Commission of India (CCI) found that two chemist associations and two pharmaceutical companies had engaged in a system of no-objection certificates (NOC) under which the associations prescribed which stockist could stock a company’s (...)

Pallavi Shroff, John Handoll, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Harman Singh Sandhu, Manika Brar, Aparna Mehra, Gauri Chhabra, Yaman Verma, Rohan Arora The Indian Competition Commission clears a merger, subject to remedies, in the electricity market (Larsen & Toubro/Schneider Electric)

32

The CCI cleared the proposed acquisition of the electrical and automation business of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) by Schneider Electric and MacRitchie Investments (the Acquirers) on foot of a package of behavioural remedies proposed by the Acquirers. After a lengthy investigation, the CCI (...)

Pallavi Shroff, John Handoll, Naval Satarawala Chopra, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Harman Singh Sandhu, Manika Brar, Aparna Mehra, Gauri Chhabra, Yaman Verma, Rohan Arora The Indian Competition Commission finds that a company abuses its dominant position by requiring device manufacturers wishing to pre-install apps to adhere to a compatibility standard (Google Android)

54

Following a complaint made by a number of users of smartphones using the Android operating system, the CCI prima facie found that Google was dominant in the market for licensable smart mobile device operating systems in India and had abused its dominant position by requiring device (...)

Shweta Shroff Chopra, Rohan Arora The High Court of Delhi challenges constitutional validity of provisions of the Competition Act on a complaint by a car manufacturer accused of abusing its dominant position (Mahindra & Mahindra)

301

On 10 April 2019, a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi pronounced its judgment in Mahindra & Mahindra v. Competition Commission of India, which challenged the constitutional validity of a number of provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act). In addition to holding the (...)

Send a message