Michaël Perche

Baker Mckenzie (Paris)
Lawyer (Associate)

Michaël Perche works as Associate Lawyer in the Public/Environment practice group of Baker McKenzie in Paris. He graduated from Essec Business School and from the University of Paris II Panthéon-Assas. Before joining Baker McKenzie in 2016, he was an Associate Lawyer in the law firm Foussard – Froger (Lawyers at the Council of State and Court of Cassation). He also underwent several internships, notably in the law firms Gide Loyrette Nouel (2012) and Willkie Farr & Gallagher (2014), at Société Générale (2013) or at the Administrative Court of Paris (2011).

Contact

Linked author

Baker Mckenzie (Paris)
France 88 contributions 26771 visits

Articles

268 Review

Emmanuel Guillaume, Michaël Perche Energy: The French Supreme Administrative Court rules on the conventionality procedure applicable before the Dispute Settlement and Sanctions Committee of the French Energy Regulatory Commission in case of refusal to implement a sanction (UFC-Que Choisir)

108

Saisi par une association de consommateurs d’une décision de refus du membre désigné par le CoRDiS de la CRE de faire suite à une plainte déposée à l’encontre d’ENEDIS, gestionnaire du réseau de transport d’électricité, le Conseil d’État a, d’une part, considéré que le moyen tiré de la violation du principe (...)

Emmanuel Guillaume, Michaël Perche Public service: The French Supreme Administrative Court considers that the withdrawal of the president’s mandate of a public broadcasting company pursuant to article 47-5 of the Law of 30 September 1986, which is not a sanction but a simple measure of regulation, can be based on elements likely to compromise its capacity to carry on its mission under conditions guaranteeing the good functioning of this company, the preservation of its independence and the implementation of the project taken into account at the time of its appointment (M. Gallet)

35

L’article 47-4 de la loi du 30 septembre 1986 relative à la liberté de communication dispose que “les présidents de la société France Télévisions, de la société Radio France et de la société en charge de l’audiovisuel extérieur de la France sont nommés pour cinq ans par le Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel, (...)

Emmanuel Guillaume, Michaël Perche Energy regulatory commission: The French Administrative Supreme Court considers, in accordance with Article L. 341-3 of the Energy Code, that the setting of the rates for additional services by the French Energy Regulatory Commission does not violate the principle of free trade and industry if and only if the services in question (i) are ancillary to the public service missions entrusted to the distribution system operator, and (ii) they are not likely to be offered by companies that do not have this quality (Eveler)

67

Les gestionnaires de réseaux publics de distribution d’électricité (“GRD”) sont en charge de l’acheminement de l’électricité sur les réseaux publics de distribution jusqu’aux consommateurs. Ils facturent cet acheminement aux utilisateurs du réseau, en application des tarifs d’utilisation des réseaux (...)

Emmanuel Guillaume, Michaël Perche Regulatory Authorities: The French Supreme Court considers that Article L. 2134-2 of the Transport Code – now Article L. 1263-2 of the same code – confers on the French Regulatory Authority for Road and Railway Activities a regulatory power when it receives a dispute settlement request, which allows it, when necessary, to ’determine, in an objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate way, the conditions of access and use of the network, and to impose them on the network operator’ (ARAFER)

58

L’Arafer dispose, pour l’exercice des missions qui lui sont confiées par les articles L. 2131-1 et suivants C. trans., d’un pouvoir règlementaire qualifié de “supplétif”, lui permettant de préciser les conditions d’accès au réseau ferroviaire et aux infrastructures de services par des textes devant être (...)

Send a message