Kristien Geeurickx

Herbert Smith Freehills (London)
Lawyer (Associate)

Kristien Geeurickx is a Professional Support Lawyer with Herbert Smith Freehills, London office. She studied at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, at the Institut Européen, Nice and at UCL (LLM) and specialises in all aspects of EU and UK competition law.

Distinctions

Linked authors

Herbert Smith Freehills (Brussels)
Herbert Smith Freehills (London)
Herbert Smith Freehills (London)
Herbert Smith Freehills (Madrid)
Herbert Smith Freehills (Paris)
RBB Economics (Brussels)
Herbert Smith Freehills (London)
Herbert Smith Freehills (London)

Articles

2100 Bulletin

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Stephen Wisking, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Government provides a withdrawal agreement for the Competition Authority’s merger control during the Brexit transition period and after

23

On 31 January 2020, at 11pm GMT, the UK ceased to be a Member State of the EU and the transition period provided for in Article 126 of the Withdrawal Agreement started to run. This briefing looks at the provisions in the Withdrawal Agreement that are relevant for merger control, both during the (...)

Stephen Wisking, Susan Black, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Competition Authority disqualifies three former directors of companies involved in a bid rigging cartel in the design, construction and fit-out services market (Robb Simms-Davies / Trevor Hall / Oliver James Hammond)

7

On 10th May 2019 the CMA secured the disqualification of three former directors of companies involved in a bid rigging cartel in the design, construction and fit-out services sector. The three directors have given legally binding disqualification undertakings under which they will be banned (...)

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Kristien Geeurickx, Stephen Wisking The EU Court of Justice holds that the principles applied in order to determine the relevant entities for liability for fines should also be applied to determine the relevant entities liable for damages under private damages claims (Vantaan kaupunki / Skanska)

9

In a preliminary ruling request made by the Finnish Supreme Court on the question of the relevant entities liable for damages, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) held that principles applied in order to determine the relevant entities for liability for fines under Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (...)

Stephen Wisking, Veronica Roberts, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Kristien Geeurickx The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal upholds the Competition Authority’s first infringement decision for breach of an interim order in a merger investigation (Electro Rent)

6

On 11 February 2019 the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) upheld the CMA’s first infringement decision for breach of an interim order imposed on a completed merger under investigation. Electro Rent had served a break notice on the lease of its UK premises without first seeking the CMA’s consent (...)

Stephen Wisking, Kristien Geeurickx, Kyriakos Fountoukakos The EU General Court confirms that a bank investor was jointly and severally liable for the conduct of one of the cartelists (Goldman Sachs)

11

The General Court’s ruling in Goldman Sachs’ appeal in the power cables cartel confirms that the bank was jointly and severally liable for the conduct of Prysmian, one of the cartelists, because of the nature of its investment in the company. The General Court confirmed that the Commission was (...)

Stephen Wisking, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Kristien Geeurickx The EU Court of Justice provides guidance on the standstill obligation which prevents parties implementing their transaction before the EU Commission issues a clearance decision (Ernst & Young)

9

For the first time since the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR) came into force the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has provided guidance on the scope the standstill obligation (Article 7(1) EUMR) which prevents parties implementing their transaction before the EU Commission issues a clearance (...)

Kristien Geeurickx The UK Supreme Court finds that the OFT did not act unlawfully in failing to repay fines imposed on tobacco manufacturers as part of a retail pricing investigation’s settlement (Gallaher / Somerfield)

11

The Supreme Court has found that the OFT (the CMA’s predecessor) did not act unlawfully in failing to repay fines imposed on Gallaher and Somerfield as part of their settlement of the OFT’s tobacco retail pricing investigation. This was the case despite there being: a successful appeal against (...)

Kristien Geeurickx The EU Commission fines €124.5 million a multinational cable and telecoms company for having implemented its acquisition prior to notifying the transaction and receiving clearance (Altice / PT Portugal)

8

The EU Commission has imposed a fine of €124.5 million on Altice, a multinational cable and telecoms company, for having implemented its acquisition of Portuguese telecoms operator PT Portugal prior to notifying the transaction and receiving clearance under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR), (...)

Kristien Geeurickx The EU Court of Justice refers back to the General Court a case for it to examine the factual and economic evidence in case and to establish whether the rebates at issue are capable of restricting competition (Intel)

10

In its long awaited judgment on Intel’s appeal against the General Court’s ruling that its rebate scheme was inherently anticompetitive and that there was no need to consider the circumstances of the case, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has today referred the case back to the (...)

Kyriakos Fountoukakos, André Pretorius, Sergio Sorinas, Kristien Geeurickx The EU Advocate General Wahl opts for a more effects-based approach on rebates and proposes annulment of the EU General Court’s judgement (Intel)

10

In Intel’s appeal against the General Court’s judgement of June 2014 (which upheld the Commission’s decision that Intel abused its dominant position by virtue of operating exclusivity rebate schemes – see here for our e-bulletin on the judgment), Advocate General Wahl recommends that the Court of (...)

André Pretorius, Henar González Durántez, Kristien Geeurickx, Kyriakos Fountoukakos, Michael Dietrich, Sergio Sorinas The EU Court of Justice rules on issues concerning retroactive rebates and the procedures through which these rebates can be characterized as abusive (Post Danmark II)

214

Introduction On 6 October 2015, the European Court of Justice (the Court) issued its preliminary ruling in Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet (Competition Council), which concerns the antitrust treatment of a retroactive rebate scheme in the market for the distribution of bulk mail. The case (...)

Kristien Geeurickx, Kyriakos Fountoukakos The EU Court of Justice considers that the bilateral exchange of pre-pricing informations to a concerted practice with the object of restricting competition is an anticompetitive practice (Dole)

305

In its ruling of 19 March 2015 (Case C-286/13P) relating to the banana cartel, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) dismissed the appeal by banana importer Dole against the General Court’s judgment in its entirety. The CJEU agreed with the Commission’s findings, supported by the General Court, (...)

Kristien Geeurickx, Kyriakos Fountoukakos The EU Court of Justice dismisses pharmaceutical company’s appeal against the Commission and EU General Courts’ findings that it abused its dominant position by misusing patent systems and pharmaceutical marketing procedures to exclude generic competitors from the market and restrict parallel imports (AstraZeneca)

1293

1. Introduction The Court of Justice of the EU (ECJ) has dismissed AstraZeneca’s appeal against the Commission’s and General Court’s findings that the company abused its dominant position under Article 102 TFEU by misusing the patent system and pharmaceutical marketing procedures in order to (...)

Send a message