White & Case (Brussels)

Jan Jeram

White & Case (Brussels)
Lawyer (Associate)

Jan is an associate in the Competition team of the firm’s Brussels office, where he focusses on the practice of EU law. He represents clients before the European Commission in merger control reviews and advises in cartel and abuse of dominance proceedings. Jan has particular experience in in-depth merger reviews before the European Commission. He has overseen and managed merger notification processes in a number of jurisdictions, often simultaneously. He has experience across a broad range of industries, including oil & gas, transport, IT, and medical devices. Jan also regularly advises private equity houses on a broad range of antitrust questions related to acquisitions and divestments of portfolio companies. Jan has conducted mock dawn raids for a major international company and regularly advises on questions of EU competition compliance. He also advises companies on EU regulatory law. Prior to joining White & Case in 2012, Jan worked at the European Commission, where he gained experience with the regulation of the banking and broader financial sectors. He also worked at an international law firm in Paris, where he was involved in the field of international arbitration. Jan has provided advice to Médecins Sans Frontieres, Child Rights International Network, Public International Policy Law & Policy Group, and other pro bono clients of the Firm. He has also provided input to the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) in preparing an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court and has been involved in writing amicus briefs at the post-conviction stage of a death penalty case before the South Carolina courts.


Linked authors

White & Case (Brussels)
White & Case (Washington)
White & Case (New York)
White & Case (Washington)
White & Case (New York)


1034 Bulletin

Heather Greenfield, Mark D. Powell, Nicholas Putz, George Paul, Rebecca H. Farrington, Axel P. Schulz, Jan Jeram The US DoJ and FTC implement policies in response to COVID-19 including new measures to the HSR e-filing system


Last week, in response to the outbreak of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the antitrust agencies in the United States and European Union issued policies that will affect, and may delay, merger filings and reviews. On March 13, 2020, the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and Federal Trade (...)

Mark D. Powell, Axel P. Schulz, Jan Jeram The EU General Court holds that institutional investors can face parental liability for infringement of EU competition law (Power Cables cartel)


On 12 July 2018, the EU’s General Court handed down 12 judgments relating to the power cables case. Among these was a judgment which confirmed that a parent company able to exercise all the voting rights in a subsidiary is presumed liable for any infringement of the EU competition rules by that (...)

Assimakis Komninos, Jacquelyn MacLennan, James Killick, Jan Jeram, Jérémie Jourdan, Strati Sakellariou-Witt The EU Court of Justice endorses an effects-based assessment of rebates (Intel)


This article has been nominated for the 2018 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. On 6 September 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU" or "Court") essentially held in Intel that the European Commission ("Commission") cannot (...)

Send a message