Florian Bien

University of Würzburg
Professor

Prof. Dr. Florian Bien holds a Chair in Global Business Law, International Arbitration Law and Civil Law at the Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Germany, since 2011. Before, he was a Senior Lecturer at the Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Germany (2007 - 2011) and at the University Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne), France (2004-2007). Education included a Master in European and International Law ("Maîtrise en Droit"), University of Aix-Marseille III, France (1999), First and Second State Examination, Tübingen, Germany (2001 and 2003), Doctorate in law and Habilitation, both University of Tübingen (2006 and 2011). Prof. Bien regularly publishes in the field of German and European Competition Law. He is the founder and organizer of the "Studienkreis Wettbewerb und Innovation", a Discussion Group bringing together both legal and economic scholars and practitioners specialising in Competition Law.

Linked authors

German Monopolies Commission (Monopolkommission)
Julius-Maximilians-University
Menold Bezler (Stuttgart)
University of Würzburg
Helmut Schmidt University of the Armed Forces (Hamburg)
University Paris Nanterre
University Lille 2
Université Caen Normandie

Videos

Florian Bien (Université de Wurtzbourg)
Florian Bien 28 March 2019 Paris

Articles

12416 Review

Catherine Prieto, Laurence Idot, Martine Behar-Touchais, Florian Bien, David Bosco, Jose-Maria Carpi-Badia, Etienne Chantrel, Marta Giner Asins, Didier Théophile, Simon Vande Walle, Jérôme Vidal Towards a European merger control network

265

The European Competition Network (ECN), which is well-known as an effective mechanism of cooperation for the application of articles 101 and 102 TFEU, is not extended to merger rules. However, the need for cooperation in this area encouraged the Commission and the national competition (...)

Florian Bien, Sylvaine Poillot-Peruzzetto, Mercedes Pedraz Calvo Limitation period for actions for damages (3rd Private Enforcement Conference: The current state of private enforcement in the EU and France - Paris Court of Appeal, March 28th, 2019)

352

The transposition of the rules on the limitation period for bringing an action for damages into national law - Comparative remarks Florian Bien Professor, University of Würzburg In its Manfredi and Cogéco judgments on the limitation period for actions for damages for breaches of competition (...)

Florian Bien Germany: The Bundeskartellamt sends statement of objections to the world’s biggest social network and qualifies its general terms imposed on users as abusive exploitation (Facebook)

210

Conceptions of ordoliberalism - particularly influential in Germany to some extent up to the present day - emphasize the role of competition as a means of protecting the individual freedom of economic power. In view of the above, competition is one of the essential conditions for freedom of (...)

Cristoforo Osti, Florian Bien, Florian Wagner-von Papp, Frank Kroes, Laurence Idot Private damages actions before and after the implementation of the Directive (Implementation of the EU Damages Directive into Member State law - Würzburg, May 5, 2017)

1193

The majority of Member States have implemented the European Directive on Private Damages Actions for Breach of Competition Law, into their respective law, albeit with some delay. In particular, England, Germany, and the Netherlands, but also France and Italy have faced a certain number of (...)

Anne-Sophie Choné-Grimaldi, Emmanuelle Claudel, Florian Bien, Thomas Cheng Kin-Hon Intermediation platforms (Competition law enforcement in the digital sector - Nanterre, 17 November 2016)

1064

Case 3 illustrates the practices of an intermediation platform referencing professionals; The case was studied in the scope of UE, German, French, American, Chinese and Japanese laws. An economist has also shared his point of view. 1. The Moov’ is an intermediation platform with a network of (...)

Florian Bien Germany : The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf by way of a temporary injunction suspends the Ministerial Authorisation for the takeover of a supermarket chain by its large competitor, who promised to preserve 16,000 precarious jobs at the target company (EDEKA, Kaiser‘s Tengelmann)

156

"Europe has the means to develop [world] champions as long as it does not prevent concentrations of its companies against giants like Google or Facebook. We need to build up large European […]groups. This requires a change of approach on the part of the European Commission on the application of (...)

Anne-Sophie Choné-Grimaldi, Ashley E. Bass, Florian Bien, Florian Wagner-von Papp, Luis Loras, Miguel Angel Malo, Paul Hitchings, Peter D. Camesasca, Rafael P. Amaro, Silvia Pietrini Implementation of EU Directive 2014/104 on actions for damages for infringements of competition law

4375

The directive on actions for damages for infringements of the competition law has been published on 26 november 2014. This On Topic aims to show the principal issues that arise from the expected implementation of the directive on national laws. Presentation ---- Anne-Sophie Choné-Grimaldi (...)

Florian Bien, Jochen Bernhard Germany : The Düsseldorf Court of Appeals declares contra bonos mores and thus null and void the cession of damages claims for antitrust injury to a third party not having the necessary resources at its disposal, and upholds the judgment of the Regional Court of Düsseldorf dismissing the atypical collective action directed against the members of the German cement cartel (Zement II)

356

CA Düsseldorf, 18 Feb. 2015, Az: VI U (Kart) 3/14 - Zement II (Cartel Damage Claims) This note is an extension of the commentary on the judgment of the Düsseldorf Regional Court of 17 December 2013 in the case between the Belgian company specialising in the recovery of damages from victims of (...)

Florian Bien Germany : The Düsseldorf District Labour Court dismisses the action filed by a company aiming to condemn its previous manager to reimburse the fine paid for a competition infringement (ThyssenKrupp)

161

In European law, sanctions against infringements of antitrust law primarily concern companies. They are the addressees of the rules laid down in competition law. They alone can be ordered to pay the fines imposed by the European Commission. On the other hand, national legislation also focuses (...)

Florian Bien, Rüdiger Morbach Germany: The Appellate Court of Munich declares invalid an arbitration agreement between a professional speed skater and the International Skating Union (ISU), holding that the ISU has abused its market power by requiring the athlete to consent to arbitration at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) (Pechstein)

265

A case is pending before the German Federal Court of Justice, the outcome of which may have consequences not only for German arbitration but also for international sports arbitration. The case concerns the revision of the judgment in the Pechstein case, named after the plaintiff and famous (...)

Florian Bien, Markus Welzenbach Germany: The Regional Court of Potsdam declares void a contractual clause in the award conditions of a public procurement procedure granting to a municipality a lump sum compensation of 15 percent of the total order value in case of an established infringement of competition law, whereas the Regional Court of Berlin accepts a similar clause

181

The implementation of private actions for damages for violations of competition law is a real challenge for victims. The main difficulties relate mainly to proving the occurrence of damage and its extent. It is clear that it is easier for public authorities than for private individuals to (...)

Björn Becker, Florian Bien Germany : The Düsseldorf Court of Appeals declares inadmissible a third party’s application for annulment of a commitment decision by the Bundeskartellamt (RTL, Prosiebensat 1)

167

The decisions of the competition authority do not only concern the economic situation of the respective addressees. They often affect third parties in their legally protected interests. The clearest example comes from merger control. While the approval of such operations by the competition (...)

Florian Bien, Jochen Bernhard Private enforcement: The regional court of Düsseldorf declares contra bonos mores the cession of damages claims for antitrust injury to a third party not having the necessary resources at its disposal and thus dismisses the atypical collective action directed against the members of the German cement cartel (Zementkartell II)

168

Regional Court of Düsseldorf, Judgement of 17 December 2013, 37 O 200/09 (Kart.) U. - Zementkartell II (Cement II) Despite a large number of innovations introduced by the 7th and 8th amendments to the Act against Restraints of Competition (Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen - GWB) and (...)

Florian Bien, Per Rummel Germany: The German Federal Court of Justice, by giving a new interpretation to the 10 percent threshold, rules that the provision is in line with the German constitution bringing the Bundeskartellamt to review its guidelines on antitrust fines (Ciment gris, KRB)

126

Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice), 26.02.2013, Grey cement, KRB 20/12 The illegal cement cartels concluded in Germany in the 1990s and the legal debates that followed them constitute an important page in the history of German cartel law. This applies both to the enforcement of (...)

Florian Bien Germany: The Federal Court of Justice clarifies the requirements for proving the existence of an oligopoly on the German petrol station markets (KVR 95/10 ; Total/OMV)

194

The development of fuel prices at German service stations remains an issue of continuing concern to consumers. Under the eighth amendment of the German Act against Restrictions of Competition, it is planned to amend the German Act against Restrictions of Competition (see Concurrences n° 3-2012), (...)

Florian Bien Germany: The Düsseldorf Court of Appeal also refuses to grant access to the files voluntarily submitted by a leniency applicant (V-4 Kart 5 + 6/11 (OWi) ; Kaffeeröster)

125

After the final judgment of the Bonn District Court in the Pfleiderer case (see Concurrences n° 2-2012pp. 174-176), the question of access to the documents provided to the Bundeskartellamt under the leniency programme seemed to be practically settled. There appeared to be little need for (...)

Florian Bien Germany – Damages: The German Federal Court of Justice rules that indirect purchasers have standing to sue in private antitrust litigation but at the same time allows infringers to invoke the possibility that the overcharge might have been passed on (ORWI)

372

Bundesgerichtshof, 28 Juni 2011, ORWI, Az. KZR 75/10 With the adoption in 2005 of the 7th amendment to the Law against Restrictions of Competition (Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbs¬beschränkungen), the German legislator introduced important innovations designed to make the legal protection of victims of (...)

Florian Bien Germany – Access to documents: The civil court of Bonn upholds the Bundeskartellamt’s refusal to grant access to the files voluntarily submitted by a leniency applicant (Pfleiderer)

255

Amtsgericht Bonn, judgment of 18 January 2012, Pfleiderer, aff. 51 Gs 53/09 The Pfleiderer case has created quite a stir. The enforcement of competition rules by public authorities on the one hand and by private parties on the other risks hampering each other. As a general rule, the easier (...)

Florian Bien, Per Rummel Germany: The Bundeskartellamt considers the rebate system of a pharmaceutical company to be equivalent to the exclusive distribution agreement that it has already prohibited (Merck)

180

Bundeskartellamt, Decision of 19 May 2011, case B 3 - 139/10 - Merck Rebate schemes are a widespread form of price discrimination used by dominant firms to foreclose competitors. The European Commission has already taken a number of decisions in relation to such practices, notably in (...)

Send a message