Enzo Marasà

Portolano Cavallo (Milan)
Lawyer (Partner)

Enzo joined Portolano Cavallo in November 2016, focusing on antitrust, as well as regulatory and unfair commercial practices. Over his fifteen year career, Enzo has assisted national and multinational companies on issues of competition and EU law: merger control, anti-competitive agreements, abuses of a dominant position, challenging decisions of antitrust authorities, private antitrust litigation, restrictive regulatory measures on the free movement in the single market, distribution or cooperation agreements between competitors, technology transfers, implementation of antitrust compliance programs, etc. He has particular experience in the following sectors: telecommunications and Internet, electronic payment services, e-commerce, fashion and luxury, and pharmaceutical and biomedical. Enzo represents clients before the Italian Competition Authority, the European Commission and the Courts of the European Union. Before joining Portolano Cavallo, Enzo collaborated, among others, with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliff in Brussels and BonelliErede, in Brussels and Milan. Enzo was awarded a Law Degree in 2003 and a post-graduate diploma in 2004 National and EU Competition Law, both by Università degli Studi di Milano Statale. He authored numerous articles and publications on national newspapers and legal journals in the field of competition law.

Linked author

Portolano Cavallo (Milan)


663 Bulletin

Enzo Marasà The Italian Competition Authority, Communications Authority, and Data Protection Authority publish the findings of a joint sector inquiry into the field of big data


On February 10, 2020 the Italian Authorities for Communications, Competition and Data Protection published the findings of a joint sector inquiry into the field of Big Data (“Investigation”), which lasted almost three years. It was launched on May 30, 2017 to study the functioning and impact of (...)

Enzo Marasà The EU General Court holds that patent settlements may be deemed “pay-for-delay” agreements only if there are reverse payments, and the originator may not be held dominant if the market is not assessed rigorously (Servier)


The Servier judgments: patent settlements may be deemed “pay-for-delay” agreements, and thus by-object infringements of Article 101 TFEU only if Commission substantiates strong indication of “reverse payment” or “abnormal inducement” from the originator to the generic; further, the originator cannot (...)

Enzo Marasà The Italian Competition Authority provides useful guidance on under what circumstances an incumbent may associate with a competitor in a public tender for blood derivatives (Kedrion / Grifols)


In January 2018 the AGCM launched an investigation for a possible breach of Article 101 TFEU against two international manufacturers of blood-based pharmaceuticals – Kedrion S.p.A (“Kedrion”) and Grifols Italia S.p.A (“Grifols”) – for participating as a joint venture to a public tender (issued by a (...)

Enzo Marasà The Italian Competition Authority imposes FRAND licensing to a local newspaper in a paradigm for the essential facility doctrine applied to copyrights (Società Iniziative Editoriali)


On 20 December 2017, the Italian Competition Authority (or “ICA”) issued a rare infringement decision in an abuse of dominance investigation against the publisher of a local daily newspaper (“SIE”), which refused to deal with a player (the “complainant” or “Euregio”) in the downstream local market for (...)

Send a message