Dina Jubrail

Baker Botts (London)
Lawyer (Associate)

Dina Jubrail is an associate in the London office. Ms. Jubrail’s practice focuses on all aspects of EU and UK competition law, including mergers and acquisitions, abuse of dominance investigations, EU and UK litigation, State aid and antitrust counseling. Ms. Jubrail has particular experience in the telecommunications, information technology and maritime industries. She also has an in-depth knowledge of the relationship between competition and regulatory law in the digital sphere, as well as on the intersection between IP and antitrust. Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Jubrail was an associate in Brussels at another international law firm. Ms. Jubrail also gained experience as a Competition & Regulatory Lawyer in the London office of a large telecommunications company.

Linked authors

Hogan Lovells (Brussels)
AkzoNobel (Brussels)
Baker Botts (Brussels)
Baker Botts (Brussels)
Baker Botts (Washington)
Baker Botts (Brussels)
Baker Botts (Brussels)
Baker Botts (London)

Articles

1057 Bulletin

Dina Jubrail, Matthew Levitt The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal rejects an appeal against the Competition Authority’s merger decision in the cleaning chemicals sector (Ecolab / Holchem)

73

On 21 April 2020, the Competition Appeals Tribunal (the “CAT”) handed down its judgment (the “Judgment”) rejecting the appeal of Ecolab Inc. (“Ecolab”), a global company incorporated in the US, against the CMA’s merger decision on Ecolab’s acquisition of The Holchem Group Ltd (“Holchem”), a UK-based (...)

Matthew Levitt, Leigh Hancher, Dina Jubrail The UK Competition Authority publishes guidance on its functions to explain the effects of Brexit on the application of competition law in the UK during and after the transition period

22

The EU and the UK have now both set out their negotiating mandates for the forthcoming trade negotiations. On 25 February 2020, the Council of the EU adopted a formal decision authorising the commencement of trade negotiations with the UK, together with a revised version of the European (...)

Dina Jubrail, Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Matthew Levitt, Daniel Vasbeck The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf suspends an order of the German Competition Authority on an alleged abuse of dominance in the social networks (Facebook)

190

On 26 August 2019, a German appeal court suspended an order of the German competition authority (the “FCO”) which had found that Facebook’s data processing practices in Germany constituted an abuse of dominance in breach of German antitrust rules (the “decision”). Expressing serious doubts as to the (...)

Dina Jubrail, Matthew Levitt, Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Daniel Vasbeck The German Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf suspends the Competition Authority’s decision that a social media company’s data processing practices constitute an abuse of dominance (Facebook)

18

On 26 August 2019, a German appeal court suspended an order of the German competition authority (the “FCO”) which had found that Facebook’s data processing practices in Germany constituted an abuse of dominance in breach of German antitrust rules (the “decision”). Expressing serious doubts as to the (...)

Graham Brough, Dina Jubrail, Matthew Levitt The EU Commission concludes that constituted an unlawful State aid the UK’s policy of allowing total or partial exemption for non-trading finance profits from the UK controlled foreign company rules

35

Following an investigation opened in October 2017, the European Commission ("EC") has concluded that the UK’s policy (from 2013-2018) of allowing total or partial exemption for non-trading finance profits from the UK Controlled Foreign Company ("CFC") rules in part constituted unlawful State (...)

Matthew Levitt, David Cardwell, Dina Jubrail The UK Court of Appeal upholds the UK Competition Authority’s fining and confirms that a single exchange of pricing information is sufficient for a "by object" infringement (Balmoral)

317

ONE-TIME INFORMATION EXCHANGE SUFFICIENT – A RECENT REMINDER IN THE UK* The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”) recently welcomed the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of a challenge brought against a decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”) by Balmoral, a supplier of steel water (...)

Christopher Thomas, Dina Jubrail, Gianni de Stefano The EU Court of Justice issues a preliminary ruling on the liability for anti-competitive behaviour by employees and outside contractors (VM Remonts)

402

Liability for anti-competitive behaviour by your employees and outside contractors: when you are off the hook and when you are not* In its recent VM Remonts judgment, the Court of Justice of the EU has confirmed the strict liability of companies for the anti-competitive behaviour of their (...)

Send a message