Mergers and competition : EU and French perspectives
See documents
David Sevy
Compass Lexecon (Paris)
Economist (Executive Vice President)
David Sevy is an Executive Vice President in the competition policy group of Compass Lexecon Europe and previously a Managing Director in the LECG Paris office. David has advised clients on a wide variety of competition policy issues, covering sectors as diverse as oil, consumer goods, retailing, book publishing, music, industrial gases, outsourcing services, transport, automotive, healthcare, telecommunications, energy, and financial services. David has advised clients in major merger or antitrust cases at the European Commission level and at the level of the French competition authorities as well as other jurisdictions. David has also acted as economic expert in several litigation damages and arbitration cases (Treaty and ICC) involving sectors such as transportation, energy, defense systems and pharmaceuticals. He is featured in the Who’s Who of Competition Economists and in the Who’s Who of Commercial Arbitration. David graduated from Ecole Polytechnique (1986) and received his Ph.D. in Economics from Ecole Polytechnique (1993). After a post-doc at AT&T Bell Laboratories (1994), David worked for France Télécom (1994–1999) as senior regulatory economist. He then joined McKinsey & Company in Paris, from 1999–2002, where he was involved in numerous strategy and management projects for telecommunications, high technology and pharmaceuticals companies. David´s academic research focused mainly on theoretical and applied industrial economics. He is currently adjunct professor of economics at Ecole Polytechnique, teaching antitrust economics, after having taught business and organization economics. David is co-author of the textbook Economie de l’entreprise, aux Editions de l’Ecole Polytechnique and is frequently invited as speaker at competition policy conferences.
Linked authors
Valérie Rabassa
Conseil régional de Midi-Pyrénées
Jorge Padilla
Compass Lexecon (Brussels)
Jean-François Bellis
Van Bael & Bellis (Brussels)
Laure Schulz
RBB Economics (Paris)
Laurence Idot
University Paris II Panthéon‑Assas
Bruno Lasserre
French State Council (Paris)
Jacques-Philippe Gunther
Latham & Watkins (Paris)
David Tayar
Clifford Chance (Paris)
10997 | Conferences
Mergers and competition : EU and French perspectives
See documents
Videos
Articles
24039 Bulletin
95
When Information Is Not (Market) Power: Using Quantitative Techniques To Show That Information Exchange Did Not Facilitate Collusion* Abstract On January 2015, the French competition authority claimed that some car rental companies infringed competition law by sharing monthly information (...)
5844
Presentation Context of the claim 1. On 12 February 2008, the French Competition Council (hereafter the “Council”) has rejected Free’s claim for interim measures regarding the conditions of access to civil engineering facilities of France Télécom (hereafter “FT”), in the context of the development (...)
9930
Background Direct Energie (hereafter ‘DE’) is a new entrant in the French retail electricity market which supplies small professional customers. It purchases energy from EDF through a bilateral wholesale contract concluded in December 2005 (hereafter ‘EDF-DE contract’). DE has seized Conseil de la (...)
8170
The French Competition Authority (FCA) has fined € 300,000 NGK Spark Plugs France for a vertical agreement with its distributors involving an exclusive dealing provision. NGK Spark Plugs France is one of the main producers of spark plugs for motorcycles (two-stroke engines) in France. The FCA’s (...)
39987 Review
1040
It was questionable whether this important judgment would close the debate on the interpretation of Article 102 TFEU. Will it put an end to the controversial and even polemical topics related to the interpretation of Article 102 TFEU and in particular to the debate on the effects-based (...)
533
Decisional practice concerning multilateral interchange fees applicable to various payment means is now well established, with competition authorities converging towards a strict regulation of the levels of these fees. However, from an economic perspective, there remain serious methodological (...)
1028
This set of two papers is derived from the training session on the exchange of information organized by the Concurrences Review that has held on April 3, 2013 in Paris. In the first contribution, Sabine Naugès and Severine Rissier, lawyers at Mc Dermott Will & Emery, compare and contrast the (...)
983
1. Vous êtes le nouveau chef économiste de l’Autorité de la concurrence depuis le 1er mai 2013. D’où et de quand date votre intérêt pour la régulation des marchés et la politique de concurrence en particulier, et comment celui-ci s’articule-t-il avec votre parcours ? 2. Pourriez-vous nous décrire le (...)
866
Ce dossier réunit trois contributions sur l’application privée du droit de la concurrence présentées le 5 juillet 2012 lors d’une conférence à Bruxelles organisée par la revue Concurrences. Dans la première contribution, Frédéric Jenny, président du Comité de la concurrence de l’OCDE, expose les (...)
1842
This set of three papers is derived from the training session on the multiproducts competition organised by Concurrences Review that has held on the 15th March 2011 in Paris. In the first contribution, Anne Perrot, Vice President of the Competition Authority, exposes the specificities of (...)
2072
This set of papers is derived from the training session organised by Concurrences Review that has held on 14th December 2010 in Paris. For M. Choné, auhor of the first paper, the regulation of infrastructures involves difficult economic challenges. Upgrading infrastructures and building new (...)
2589
When determining a pecuniary sanction, the French Competition Authority will take into account several criteria including the « damage to the economy » caused by the illicit practice. Evaluating this damage involves several variables and the task remains inherently complex due to the lack of (...)
2506
This mini-symposium takes stock of practical advances in competition damage evaluation. Combining perspectives from competition authorities, academics and practitioners respectively, it shows the existence of common principles and a set of widely accepted methods to calculate damages that may (...)
2734
This set of three papers are derived from the training session on oligopolies with homogeneous products organised by Concurrences Review and held on 21st January 2010 in Paris. The first paper is a short introduction by Prof. Anne Perrot aimed at briefly introducing the relevant notions. The (...)
6570
Recent case law of the European Courts, the recent guidelines of the European Commission on non-horizontal mergers, the decisional practice of the European Commission as well as that of various national competition authorities and courts seem to focus on the possible anticompetitive foreclosure (...)
7612
Présentation Laurence Idot Professeur, Universtité Paris II, Collège européen Directeur du Comité scientifique de Concurrences 1. C’est en qualité de responsable du comité scientifique de la revue Concurrences qu’il m’a été demandé de faire la présentation de cette matinée. J’avoue avoir en partie (...)
9612
In 2003 and 2004, the European Commission made a series of significant reforms both to Community competition law and DG Competition. The legislative reforms were accompanied by equally far-reaching internal reforms to the organisation and procedures within DG Competition. This set of three (...)
68 rue Amelot
885 6th Avenue #32G
