Bird & Bird (The Hague)

Pauline Kuipers

Bird & Bird (The Hague)
Partner

Pauline Kuipers is an EU & competition law partner in the Hague and head of Bird & Bird’s International Competition & EU Group. Pauline specialises in EU and Dutch competition law with a particular focus on regulated markets like communications, media, life sciences. In competition law matters, she has experience in cartel procedures, abuse of dominance matters, merger notifications to the Dutch competition authority and European Commission as well as coordination of multiple merger filings, private enforcement actions, competition regulation of network industries as well as the media sector and competition rules on undertakings granted special or exclusive rights by the state. Her practice also includes public procurement law and assistance in regulatory investigations (telecoms, post, consumer law, energy). Pauline’s previous experience in Intellectual Property law has brought her specific expertise to advise in matters on the verge between competition law and intellectual property, such as licensing arrangements and other technology transfer agreements, standardization discussions, refusal to license, abuse of IP rights etc.

Linked authors

Bird & Bird (Warsaw)
Bird & Bird (Rome)
Bird & Bird (Budapest)
Bird & Bird (Sydney)
Bird & Bird (The Hague)

Articles

8725 Bulletin

Pauline Kuipers, Reshmi Rampersad, Sander Wagemakers The Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules that two Dutch collective rights organisations abused their joint dominant position by applying unequal conditions when licensing music to businesses (Buma / Stemra)

106

Introduction The Court of Appeal of Amsterdam (Gerechtshof Amsterdam) ruled that Dutch collective rights management organisations ‘Buma’ and ‘Stemra’ abused their (joint) dominant position by applying unequal conditions in relation to business licensing of music for use in cafés, (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Joost van Roosmalen The Rotterdam District Court rules on an appeal against the Competition Authority’s merger clearance decision and finds that merger control rules do not aim to protect competitors on the market potentially affected by the establishment of a joint venture (T-Mobile)

86

Summary On 31 March 2022, the Rotterdam District Court ruled on an appeal lodged by T-Mobile Netherlands against a merger clearance decision by the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) of 12 May 2021 that KPN and APG did not require a licence for the creation of a concentration (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Tialda Beetstra The Dutch Competition Authority imposes a fine totaling €40 million on one of the world’s largest producers of electronic devices for resale price maintenance (Samsung)

224

Dutch ACM fines Samsung almost € 40 million for resale price maintenance* The Dutch competition authority ACM fined Samsung Electronics Benelux B.V. (“Samsung”) € 39,875,500 for coordinating the retail prices of Samsung television sets together with various retailers. The alleged coordination (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Ariane Le Strat, Jörg Witting The EU Commission publishes its long-awaited draft Vertical Agreement Block Exemption Regulation and accompanying Guidelines on Vertical Restraints

191

Introduction Following a comprehensive evaluation process which began in 2018, the EU Commission published on 9 July 2021 its long-awaited draft vertical agreement block exemption regulation (Draft VBER) and accompanying guidelines (Draft Guidelines). The current VBER and Guidelines, which (...)

Joost van Roosmalen, Pauline Kuipers, Shane Barber, Scott McInnes The Dutch Competition Authority closes a regulatory investigation into a payment apps’ access from a Big Tech company (Apple)

226

The Dutch competition authority (ACM) has decided to close its investigation into payment apps’ access to Apple’s Near-Field Communication (NFC) antenna. The ACM concludes that the EU Interchange Fee Regulation (IFR) does not provide a legal basis for its investigation. As Bird & Bird (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Matteo Stainer The Rotterdam District Court establishes joint and several liability for damages from the elevators cartel case but declares part of the claim time-barred (Otis / Kone / Schindler / ThyssenKrupp)

120

Summary On 23 June 2021, the District Court of Rotterdam (“District Court”) held that a so-called special purpose vehicle, was eligible as a claimant for part of the cartel damages it had claimed. The claimant Stichting Elevator Cartel Claim (“SECC”), represented many customers who had (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Morten Nissen, Alexander Brøchner, Joost van Roosmalen Block exemption regulations: An overview of EU and national case law

2333

Competition law contains wide-ranging prohibitions against anticompetitive issues when companies enter into agreements with either competitors, suppliers or distributors. The content of the prohibitions has developed in 60+ years of case law and is backed up by competition authorities having the authority to carry out intrusive investigations and imposing fines. Navigating these prohibitions can sometimes be difficult and involve substantial assessment and judgment calls. It is up to companies to self-assess their agreements to ensure compliance. Block exemption regulations (or in short ‘block exemptions’) are amongst the most used EU antitrust tools in day to day operations for competition law advisors, both in private practice and in companies. Block exemptions play an important role in ensuring inter alia consistency and legal certainty in (self) assessing a range of common commercial actions when dealing with e.g. competitors, suppliers and distributors. Without block exemptions, it would be much more complex for companies to assess, whether many of their commonly occurring activities entail any risk of constituting infringements of competition law.

Annette Printz Nielsen, Hans Svensson, Kim Kit Ow, Slawomir Szepietowski, Stefano Febbi, Konrad Siegler, Michael Jünemann, Kristiina Lehvilä, Ivan Sagál, Michelle Chan, Shane Barber, Joost van Roosmalen, Trystan Tether, Pauline Kuipers, Scott McInnes, Cathie-Rosalie Joly, Adrián Calvo Pelayo The Dutch Competition Authority publishes its report on the role of big techs in the payment market

763

Dutch regulator calls for tighter regulation of Big Techs in payment market study On 1 December 2020, the Dutch competition authority (ACM) published its long-awaited report on the role of major technology firms (Big Techs) in the payment market. The publication of the report was expected in (...)

Manuela Cox, Piet-Hein Eijssen, Pauline Kuipers The Amsterdam Court of Appeal finds no abuse of dominance by one of the largest national real estate agencies in its ranking of online advertisements (VBO / NVM / Funda)

296

On 26 May 2020, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal (“Court”) delivered its judgment in a dispute between the real estate association VBO Makelaars (“VBO”) versus the Dutch Association of Real Estate Agents (“NVM”) over the online real estate platform of Funda Real Estate (“Funda”). The Court (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Dutch Competition Authority unconditionally clears the acquisition of a publishing company and concludes that no in-depth phase II merger control investigation is required as sufficient competition will remain in the online-advertising market and free online news market (Sanoma / DPG)

190

On 10 April 2020, the Netherlands Authority for Consumers & Markets (“ACM”) unconditionally cleared the acquisition of publishing company Sanoma Media Netherlands (“Sanoma”) by DPG Media (“DPG”) and concluded that no in-depth phase 2 merger control investigation was required as sufficient (...)

Piet-Hein Eijssen, Pauline Kuipers The Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal reverses a decision of the Competition Authority requiring telecom providers to open up their fixed networks in the Netherlands to other providers (KPN / VodafoneZiggo / T-Mobile / Tele2)

207

On 17 March 2020, the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (“CBb”) reversed the 2018 decision of the Authority for Consumers and Markets (“ACM”) requiring telecom providers KPN and VodafoneZiggo to open up their fixed networks in the Netherlands to other providers. In September 2018, (...)

Pauline Kuipers The Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal confirms that a company on which no fine is imposed could still be able to appeal the infringement decision in cases that it is held jointly and severally liable for the cartel infringement of its wholly-owned subsidiary (College van Beroep)

94

On 18 February 2020 the Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (“CBb”) ruled that a company may still have an interest in bringing proceedings against a cartel infringement decision even if no fine is imposed on it and even if it is not the direct addressee of the infringement decision. In (...)

Piet-Hein Eijssen, Pauline Kuipers The Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules that cartel damages claims filed by a claim vehicle are not time-barred under Spanish, Finnish, and Swedish law in the chemicals market (CDC / Kemira)

221

On 4 February 2020, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal (“Court of Appeal”) ruled that cartel damage claims that were filed by claim vehicle CDC against Kemira were not time-barred under Spanish, Finnish and Swedish law. The Court of Appeal also dismissed Kemira’s challenge to the way in which the (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Dutch Competition Authority imposes a fine of €1.84 million on a company for failing to comply with the duty to cooperate during an on-site investigation (Onderneming)

103

On 10 December 2019 , the Authority for Consumers & Markets ("ACM") imposed a fine of € 1,84 million on a company for the failure to comply with the duty to cooperate as laid down in Article 5:20(1) of the Dutch General Administrative Law Act ("GALA"). ACM found that during an on-site (...)

Piet-Hein Eijssen, Pauline Kuipers The Dutch Court of Appeal in Arnhem-Leeuwarden applies the EU competition law notion of an undertaking in a cartel damages claim procedure (GIS Cartel)

176

On 26 November 2019 the Court of Appeal of Arnhem ("Court of Appeal") applied the EU competition law notion of an ‘undertaking’ in a cartel damage claim procedure between TenneT and entities belonging to the Alstom group of companies. The Court of Appeal ruled that one of these entities (...)

Mariska Van De Sanden, Janneke Kohlen, Pauline Kuipers The Dutch Competition Authority publishes a sector report on the impact of biosimilars on competition between TNF-alfa inhibitors

561

Dutch competition authority ACM publishes a sector report on the impact of biosimilars on competition between TNF-alfa inhibitors* The Dutch competition authority, ACM, initiated a market study in 2018 into the effect of the introduction of biosimilars on the competition between TNF alfa (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate grants a licence, overruling the Competition Authority’s decision, for overriding public interests including the continuity and affordability of high quality in the postal services sector (PostNL / Sandd)

54

In February of this year, PostNL announced its intention to acquire rival operator Sandd. In view of the rapidly declining postal volumes, the two operators consider the combination of their nationwide postal networks necessary to ensure continuity and affordability of postal services. On (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Dutch Competition Authority publishes a discussion paper suggesting ex-ante enforcement tools to deal with competition issues in the digital economy

110

In May 2019 the Dutch State Secretary of Economic Affairs & Climate (’Ministry’) stated that she will plead in Europe for a new competence in European competition enforcement to keep digital markets accessible. One of her suggestions is to enable the competition authority to intervene in (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Rotterdam District Court annuls a €41M fine imposed on a rail transport incumbent for allegedly abusing its dominant position (Nederlandse Spoorwegen)

104

On 27 June 2019 the District Court of Rotterdam annulled the decision of the Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM", the Dutch competition authority) to impose a fine of € 41 million on Dutch rail transport incumbent N.V. Nederlandse Spoorwegen ("NS") for abusing its dominant position (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Dutch Higher Court of Appeal rules an electronics company did not abuse its dominance by not licensing a patent under FRAND conditions (Asus / Philips)

89

On 7 May 2019, the The Hague Court of Appeal ("Court of Appeal") ruled against electronics company Asus in a patent dispute with electronics company Philips. The Court of Appeal found that Philips’ patent was valid and had been infringed by Asus. The manufacturer had argued that Philips abused (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Dutch Competition Authority publishes its final report on the market study into mobile app stores and simultaneously opens an investigation into potential abuse of dominance (Apple App Store)

100

On 11 April 2019 the Dutch competition authority ("ACM") published its findings on the ACM market study into mobile app stores ("Market Study"). ACM conducted the Market Study in order to gain more insight into how app providers are able to offer their apps in app stores and what influence (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Dutch Highest Administrative Court rules that private equity investors could be held liable for cartel infringements committed by their portfolio companies

38

On 19 March 2019 the highest administrative court in the Netherlands (het College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven, "CBb") ruled that private equity investors could be held liable for cartel infringements committed by their portfolio companies. In this case the Dutch Competition Authority (...)

Pauline Kuipers, Piet-Hein Eijssen The Dutch Competition Authority publishes new horizontal guidelines on cooperation between competitors and new vertical guidelines on agreements between suppliers and customers

69

On 26 February 2019, the Dutch Authority for Consumers & Markets ("ACM") published both new (horizontal) guidelines on cooperation between competitors (Leidraad: samenwerking tussen concurrenten "Horizontal restraints guidelines") and (vertical) guidelines on agreements between suppliers (...)

Books

Statistics


8725
Total visits

256.6
Number of readings per contribution

34
Number of contributions

Author's ranking
279th
In number of contributions
1121th
In number of visits
5834th
In average number of visits
Send a message