White & Case (Brussels)

Nina Frie

White & Case (Brussels)
Professional Support Lawyer

Nina Frie is a professional support competition lawyer at White & Case LLP, based in Brussels. She is responsible for the implementation and development of a knowledge strategy for the White & Case EMEA Competition practice. Prior to joining White & Case, Nina worked as a practitioner for two other leading international law firms in Brussels and London. Nina holds a Postgraduate Diploma in EU Competition Law from Kings College and LLM in International Economic Law from University of Kent.

Linked authors

White & Case (Brussels)
White & Case (Washington)
Suffolk University Law School
White & Case (Riyadh)
White & Case (New York)

Articles

1490 Bulletin

James Killick, Axel Schulz, Strati Sakellariou-Witt, Irina Trichkovska, Jérémie Marthan, Jean-Luc Champy, Nina Frie, Jia Liu The EU Commission adopts a regulation that introduces rules on the implementation of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation

277

The adopted FSR Implementing Regulation contains important changes compared to the draft published in February 2023. The focus of the FSR filings for M&A deals and public tenders in the EU will be on companies’ foreign financial contributions ("FFCs") received from non-EU countries (or (...)

James Killick, Axel Schulz, Strati Sakellariou-Witt, Irina Trichkovska, Marc Israel, Jérémie Marthan, Jean-Luc Champy, Michael Engel, Kate Kelliher, Nina Frie, Jia Liu The EU Commission starts implementing the Foreign Subsidies Regulation which creates a mechanism to screen transactions involving investors who have received financial support from third countries

58

The EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation took effect on 12 July 2023 to much fanfare. We take a look at the top five things PE funds need to know when considering acquisitions with a European footprint. The Foreign Subsidies Regulation ("FSR") is the European Commission’s attempt to level the (...)

Katarzyna Czapracka, Jérémie Jourdan, Assimakis Komninos, Tilman Kuhn, Nina Frie The EU Court of Justice confirms that the national authorities can review ex post below-threshold mergers under abuse of dominance rules (Towercast)

468

The long-awaited European Court of Justice’s judgment in Towercast confirmed that national competition authorities (and national courts) can apply abuse of dominance rules to mergers that did not trigger EU and national merger control thresholds, and were not referred to the European (...)

James Killick, Jasper Wauters, Nina Frie The EU Court of Justice AG Rantos issues two opinions arguing that two international sports associations may impose pre-authorisation requirements on third party events without violating EU competition law (ESLC / UEFA / FIFA)

255

In two separate non-binding opinions in Super League and International Skating Union issued on 15 December 2022, Advocate General Rantos concluded that sports federations can – under certain circumstances – impose pre-authorisation requirements on third party events without violating EU (...)

Jérémie Jourdan, Assimakis Komninos, Tilman Kuhn, Strati Sakellariou-Witt, Jérémie Marthan, Katarzyna Czapracka, Nina Frie The EU Court of Justice AG Kokott proposes that non-reportable transactions could be caught by abuse of dominance rules (Towercast)

194

Advocate General Juliane Kokott has proposed that the EU Court of Justice should find that competition authorities have the power to apply Article 102 TFEU to corporate transactions that are not reportable, and test under that provision whether the transaction as such constitutes an abuse of a (...)

Statistics


1490
Total visits

248.3
Number of readings per contribution

6
Number of contributions

Author's ranking
1660th
In number of contributions
3744th
In number of visits
6065th
In average number of visits
Send a message