European Commission - DG COMP (Brussels)

Juraj Siska

European Commission - DG COMP (Brussels)
Case Handler

Juraj Siska is a Case Handler at DG Comp. He has previously worked as Competition Counsel at Cartel Damage Claims. Prior to that he was an intern at Carter Damage Claims. He speaks French, English and Slovak and holds degrees from University of Strasbourg, Leiden University, Trinity College Dublin, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and he holds a LLM in European Law from the College of Europe in Bruges.

Linked authors

European Commission DG CNECT (Brussels)
European Commission (Brussels)
European Commission - DG HR (Brussels)
European Commission - DG COMP (Brussels)
DG EMPL (Brussels)

Articles

2465 Bulletin

Vasil Savov, Juraj Siska The EU Court of Justice AG Rantos delivers an opinion on the temporal application of the Antitrust Damages Directive, confirming that the nature of the rules implementing the directive is determined by EU law and not national law (RM / Volvo / DAF Trucks)

681

AG Rantos delivers a halfway opinion on the temporal application of the EU Antitrust Damages Directive (C-267/20, AB Volvo, DAF TRUCKS NV / RM)* In his opinion of 28 October 2021 (‘Opinion’), Advocate General (‘AG’) Rantos confirmed that the nature of the rules implementing the EU Damages (...)

Juraj Siska, Vasil Savov The EU Court of Justice makes a clear distinction between a cartel’s restrictive effects on competition and its damaging effects (Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto)

346

By judgement on the 14th of January 2021 in Case C-450/19, Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto (‘Judgment’), the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) stated that an infringement of Art. 101 TFEU in bid-rigging cases ends with the conclusion of the works, goods or services contract. To reach (...)

Vasil Savov, Juraj Siska, Natacha Espelta The EU Court of Justice receives a request for a preliminary ruling from the Léon Court of Appeal on the temporal application of the Damages Directive provisions on limitation and quantification of harm (Volvo / DAF Trucks)

253

In the aftermath of Directive 2014/104/EU (Directive), Spain appears to be one of the most active jurisdictions dealing with antitrust damages cases. In particular, a multitude of Spanish courts have been seized with actions for compensation in relation to the European Trucks Cartel (Case (...)

Vasil Savov, Juraj Siska, Julia Suderow The Madrid Commercial Court requests a preliminary ruling from the EU Court of Justice concerning the international competence of the court which was contested by defendants (RH / AB Volvo)

226

Choice of forum delicti in EU-wide cartel damages cases (C-30/20, RH vs Volvo) Does Art. 7(2) Brussels I bis determine territorial jurisdiction within the EU Member States, Madrid Commercial Court asks EU Court of Justice. The request for a preliminary ruling from the Madrid Commercial Court (...)

Vasil Savov, Juraj Siska The EU Court of Justice provides guidance on the interpretation of the place of the harmful event under Regulation Brussels I bis for the determination of alternative grounds of jurisdiction in pan-European cartel damages cases (Tibor-Trans / DAF Trucks)

959

With its judgment of 29 July 2019 in Case C-451/18,Tibor-Trans (the ‘Judgment’), the EU Court of Justice (the ‘CJEU’) clarified the competence of national courts to hear damage actions relating to pan-European infringements of Art. 101 TFEU under Regulation 1215/2012 Brussels I bis (in short (...)

Send a message