Jeremy Bernard
Delcade Avocats & Solicitors (Paris), Sciences Po (Paris)
Partner / Lecturer
Attorney at the Paris Bar since 2003, Jérémy Bernard is a partner at the Paris office of law firm Delcade Avocats & Solicitors. His practice encompasses the full range of EU and French competition law, including anti-competitive practices, merger control, distribution and franchising law, but also EU general law (including the so-called “Four Freedoms”), EU and French consumer law, EU and French regulation of liberalized industries (including energy, telecoms, railroads, TV and radio regulation), commercial litigation and arbitration. He represents governmental clients as well as corporate clients operating in various industries, including the energy, real estate, automobile manufacture, measuring technologies, LED, media, pharmaceutical and telecoms sectors. He works on advisory matters, investigations of and leniency application to the European Commission, the French Competition Authority and the French Directorate General for Competition, Consumers Affairs and Fraud Repression, litigations before French and EU courts and arbitration. He also advises clients on competition and consumers compliance issues. Jeremy Bernard is also a member of CEPANI, The Belgian Center for Arbitration and Mediation and a lecturer at Science Po Paris.
Linked authors
Charles Bertin
Altermind (Paris)
Paulo Burnier da Silveira
OECD - Competition Division (Paris)
Pierre Cahuc
Ecole Polytechnique IZA and CREST-INSEE
Jean-Pascal Chazal
Sciences Po (Paris)
Elie Cohen
CNRS
1736 | Events
Articles
1089 Bulletin
272
French veto to the acquisition of Photonis par Teledyne* Applying legislative and regulatory measures to control foreign investments in France, the French Government has banned the American Teledyne from buying French Photonis. 1. France established a scheme for controlling investments made (...)
263
Abstract: Last 11 September 2020, Ms. Margrethe Vestager, European Commissioner for Competition, released a new doctrine for the implementation of Article 22 of the EU Concentration Regulation. This provision empowers EU Member States to refer a merger to the European Commission for the latter (...)
199
On 5 May 2020, the German Federal Constitutional Court sitting in Karlsruhe adopted its Dr. W... e.a. ruling by seven votes to one which results in a genuine declaration of war at the Court of Justice of the European Union. Dr. W… e.a. denies the primacy of EU law over the German Basic Law and (...)
264
In its Mazda ruling of 23 January 2019, the Court of Appeal ("Cour d’Appel") of Paris confirms a developing French case law under which a supplier heading a purely qualitative selective distribution network can refuse to authorize a distributor meeting all the network’s selection criteria, (...)
91
Introduction In its Coty Germany ruling of 6 December 2017, the European Court of Justice (hereafter the “ECJ”) decided that forbidding the members of a purely qualitative selective distribution network of luxury products to sell those products on Internet platforms does not infringe the (...)
2027 Review
2027
In its Coty Germany c. Parfumerie Akzente decision dated 6 December 2017, the Court of Justice reiterated the conditions of application of Article 101 TFEU to selective distribution agreements based on qualitative criteria. The Court also ruled for the first time on the prohibition to resell (...)
Books
Price
€85.00
Dictionnaire de droit de la concurrence
Date
1 February 2023
Price
€85.00
Author’s definitions
