ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)

Görkem Yardım

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)
Counsel

Mr. Görkem Yardım is a Counsel at ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law. Görkem graduated from Ihsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, Faculty of Law in 2011. He was admitted to the Ankara Bar in 2012 and later on transferred to Istanbul Bar. Görkem obtained his first LL.M. degree in Law & Economics from Ihsan Doğramacı Bilkent University in 2013. He was granted a scholarship by Jean Monnet Scholarship Programme and then held his second LL.M. degree from King's College, London in 2014. Görkem joined ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at- Law in 2014. He has extensive experience in merger and acquisition filings, competition law compliance matters and investigations conducted by the Turkish Competition Authority. He has represented various multinational and national companies before the Turkish Competition Authority in various sectors. He is fluent in English.

Linked authors

ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)
ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law (Istanbul)

Articles

209 Bulletin

Gönenç Gürkaynak, Görkem Yardım, Aydeniz Baytaş, Melisa Terzioğlu The Turkish Competition Authority finds manufacturers of medical imaging and diagnostic devices not liable for abuse of dominance in relation to the provision of access codes and activation tools for the maintenance of medical imaging devices (Türk Philips Ticaret)

85

This case summary includes an analysis of the Turkish Competition Board’s (“Board”) Philips decision (26.08.2021, 21-40/589-286) in which the Board determined that Türk Philips Ticaret A.Ş. (“Philips Turkey”) did not abuse its dominant position through denying or delaying access to codes and (...)

Gönenç Gürkaynak, Görkem Yardım, Aydeniz Baytaş The Turkish Supreme Court annuls the Competition Authority’s decision to impose a fine on a manufacturer of personal and home care products for resale price maintenance and clarifies that RPM cases require an element of "coercion" or "incentive" (Henkel)

124

This case summary includes an analysis of the 13th Chamber of the Council of State’s reversal (E. 2021/969, K. 2021/2654, 06.07.2021) of Ankara Regional Administrative Court’s judgment (E. 2020/394, K. 2020/2451, 23.12.2020). Ankara Regional Administrative Court upheld the Turkish Competition (...)

Books

Send a message