Gerjanne te Winkel is a partner with Jones Day and is based in their Amsterdam office where she has built more than 30 years of experience in civil litigation and arbitration. She is widely recognized as one of the leading corporate litigation lawyers in the Netherlands. She has represented clients in several well publicized landmark cases before the Enterprise Division of the Amsterdam Court of Appeals, including Delta Lloyd, ABN AMRO, Versatel, Getronics, Cryo-Save, Novero, and SNS Reaal. Gerjanne frequently acts as lead counsel in international commercial arbitration cases, which includes a major international arbitration case before the Netherlands Arbitration Institute (NAI) concerning a claim under guarantees in a takeover dispute. Prior to joining Jones Day, Gerjanne successfully defended Joint Services International N.V. in a one and a half billion euro arbitration case instituted by O’Neill, Inc. before the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). In addition to her extensive corporate litigation and arbitration track record, Gerjanne focuses on directors’ liability and professional liability cases, particularly those relating to accountants, tax lawyers, and civil law notaries. Gerjanne has represented the former supervisory directors of Fairstar Heavy Transport N.V. in a directors liability case against Dockwise and also represented a consortium of financial institutions in a professional liability case against a major accountancy firm that led to the largest professional liability settlement in Dutch litigation history. Gerjanne regularly publishes and lectures on civil law and corporate governance topics at educational institutions and for the Dutch Corporate Litigation Association. She also teaches at a law academy for young lawyers and was a committee member of the Dutch Bar Association education program.
30
Brief summary of facts In its Decision of 17 March 2017, the European Commission found that several air carriers coordinated fuel and safety charges for flights within the European Economic area in the period of December 1999 till February 2006, and thus infringed the cartel prohibition. (...)
29
Brief summary of facts If this decision, the Court of Appeal Arnhem-Leeuwarden applied the Skanska judgment of the European Court of Justice (i.e. applied the competition law definition of an ‘undertaking’ within the meaning of Article 101 TFEU) to establish liability of a subsidiary for (...)
19
Brief summary of facts In its Decision of 21 February 2007, the European Commission found manufacturers of elevators and escalators infringed the cartel prohibition. EWD claimed that the material claimants / purchasers of (services related to) escalators and elevators - which allegedly (...)
41
Brief summary of facts In its Decision of 13 September 2006, the European Commission found that 8 suppliers of road construction bitumen and 6 main road manufacturers infringed the cartel prohibition. Van Gelder claimed that they suffered damage as a result of the cartel because they were (...)
39
Brief summary of facts In 1993, Sep and ABB entered into an agreement, which provided for the supply by ABB of a Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) installation to Sep that was subsequently transferred to TenneT. In its Decision of 24 January 2007, the European Commission found that, inter (...)
23
Brief summary of facts In its Decision of 6 October 2010, the European Commission found that 17 producers of pre-stressing steel infringed the cartel prohibition. Deutsche Bahn A.G. claimed it has suffered damages as a consequence of the cartel infringement. Deutsche Bahn A.G. also stated (...)
19
Brief summary of facts In its Decision of 21 February 2007, the European Commission found that manufacturers of elevators and escalators infringed the cartel prohibition. EWD claimed that the material claimants, i.e. the purchasers of (services related to) escalators and elevators - which (...)
25
Brief summary of facts In 1993, Sep and ABB entered into an agreement, which provided for the supply by ABB of a Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) installation to Sep that was transferred to TenneT. In its Decision of 24 January 2007, the European Commission found that, inter alia, ABB (...)
18
Brief summary of facts In 1993, Sep and Alstom entered into an agreement which provided for the supply by Alstom of a Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) installation to Sep that was subsequently transferred to TenneT. In its Decision of 24 January 2007, the European Commission found that, (...)
19
Brief summary of facts In 1993, Sep and ABB entered into an agreement which provided for the supply by ABB of a Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) installation to Sep that was subsequently transferred to TenneT. In its Decision of 24 January 2007, the European Commission found that, inter (...)
29
Brief summary of facts In 1993, Sep and ABB entered into an agreement which provided for the supply by ABB of a Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) installation to Sep that was subsequently transferred to TenneT. In its Decision of 24 January 2007, the European Commission found that, inter (...)
