Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. & Quiroga (Brasilia)

Eduardo Frade Rodrigues

Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. & Quiroga (Brasilia)
Lawyer (Partner)

Eduardo has vast experience in a wide range of antitrust and regulatory matters, including mergers, cartels, leniency, abuse of dominance, compliance, advocacy and general antitrust counseling. He has extensive government experience, having served in senior positions at CADE (Brazil’s antitrust authority), the Ministry of Planning, and the Civil Aviation Agency. During his tenure of more than 10 years at CADE, Eduardo was one of the leaders in restructuring the agency and implementing the new antitrust law in 2012, acting first as Deputy General Superintendent in charge of mergers and dominance, and later as General Superintendent. Eduardo is featured as a leading antitrust lawyer in several industry publications. In its last “40 under 40” edition, Global Competition Review names him one of the top 40 antitrust lawyers in the world under the age of 40. Eduardo has been a consultant to the IDB and the OECD, and is currently a member of the International Cartel Task Force and co-chair of the Corporate Counseling Committee of the American Bar Association – Antitrust Law Section. He was a guest professor at the FGV Law Program, and has published various books and articles on competition law in Brazil and abroad.

Linked authors

Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. & Quiroga (Sao Paulo)
Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. & Quiroga (Sao Paulo)
Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. & Quiroga (Rio de Janeiro)
Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. & Quiroga (Sao Paulo)
Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. & Quiroga (Rio de Janeiro)

Articles

152 Bulletin

Mariana Rodrigues Oliveira, Eduardo Frade Rodrigues The Brazilian Competition Authority confirms the five-year statute of limitations for uniform conduct in the gas stations sector (Gas stations cartel)

152

Confirming the recent understanding adopted in the ruling of the Trains Cartel, CADE’s Tribunal unanimously acknowledged, at the judgment session on June 30, the five-year statute of limitations for the conduct of influence of uniform conduct. The new orientation was confirmed in an (...)

Send a message