Morgan Lewis (Boston)

Daniel S. Savrin

Morgan Lewis (Boston)
Partner

Daniel Savrin is a partner with Morgan Lewis based in their Boston office. He represents businesses in high-stakes civil and criminal litigation in federal and state courts and in the defense of government investigations with a focus on antitrust, consumer protection, and white collar criminal matters. He is a leader of the firm’s consumer protection defense and automotive industry initiatives.

Linked authors

Morgan Lewis (Washington)
Morgan Lewis (Washington)
Morgan Lewis (Washington)
Morgan Lewis (London)
Morgan Lewis (New York)

Articles

1018 Bulletin

William McEnroe, R. Brendan Fee, Zachary M. Johns, Ryan Kantor, Steven A. Reed, Daniel S. Savrin, Mark J. Fanelli The US DoJ rescinds three longstanding pieces of guidance on the exchange of competitively sensitive information through third parties

39

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division is withdrawing three enforcement policy statements that provided important guidance on the exchange of competitively sensitive information through third parties. The guidance previously created a safe harbor for market benchmarking surveys (...)

Zachary M. Johns, Daniel S. Savrin, Mark J. Fanelli, Brian Morris The US District Court for the District of Delaware enters a federal jury’s verdict sanctioning a company for committing antitrust violations under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act in the honeycomb carbon adsorbents scrubbers in fuel vapor canisters market (BASF / Ingevity)

302

A recent BASF jury verdict highlights the breadth of the Sherman and Clayton Acts—particularly the remedies available to plaintiffs involved in the manufacturing of goods—if supply agreements are found to hinder marketplace competition. The verdict serves as an important reminder for automotive (...)

Steven A. Reed, Scott A. Stempel, Daniel S. Savrin The US Supreme Court holds that the FTC lacks the authority to seek equitable monetary relief in cases brought in federal court under FTC Act Section 13(b) (AMG Capital Management)

210

In a unanimous 9-0 decision authored by Justice Breyer, the US Supreme Court has held that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lacks the authority to seek equitable monetary relief in cases brought in federal court under FTC Act Section 13(b). The Court’s April 22, 2021, decision in AMG Capital (...)

Noah J. Kaufman, Steven A. Reed, Daniel S. Savrin, Willard K. Tom The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit clarifies the means by which the FTC can exercice its enforcement authority without being able to seek any restitution thereafter (Credit Bureau)

467

Background In the Credit Bureau Center case, the FTC sued a company and its owner for advertising “free” credit reports without adequately disclosing that consumers would be enrolled in an expensive credit monitoring service on an ongoing basis. The FTC brought its lawsuit under Section 13(b), (...)

Send a message