Winston & Strawn (Dallas)

Christopher R.J. Pace

Winston & Strawn (Dallas)
Partner

Chris Pace is a partner in Winston & Strawn’s Dallas office who focuses his practice on complex commercial and competition cases and government investigations. He has successfully litigated and resolved commercial, antitrust, and product liability lawsuits for clients in the health care, financial services, and technology industries, including health tech and fintech disputes. Chris has prevailed in defending Fortune 500 companies in courts across the country, including in multidistrict litigations. He is a highly sought-after counsel to prosecute and defend clients in lawsuits involving fraud, fraudulent inducement, antitrust and unfair competition, and to defend clients in multiparty actions involving complex causation and damages disputes. Some of his recent victories include achieving dismissal of the first private cryptocurrency antitrust lawsuit, upholding a financial service company’s immunity from liability for alleged government disclosures under the Bank Secrecy Act, and obtaining summary judgment on the eve of trial in an energy industry tortious interference and breach of contract action. Chris is also an active appellate advocate. He has successful argued appeals before an array of appellate courts, including the United States Courts of Appeals for the First, Fifth, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits. In his early career, Chris served the United States government as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. He also served as a law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Judge Alex Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit and (as an extern) Judge Edward Becker of the Third Circuit. Chris is a member of the Florida, California, District of Columbia, New York, and Texas bars.

Linked authors

Winston & Strawn (New York)
Winston & Strawn (New York)
Winston & Strawn (New York)
Winston & Strawn (London)
Winston & Strawn (New York)

Articles

172 Bulletin

Antonio F. Dias, Christopher R.J. Pace, Eliot Pedrosa, Cristina Pérez Soto The US District Court for the Southern District of Florida rules that corporate-competitor plaintiffs may recover lost profits under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (Tymar Distribution / Mitchell Group)

172

Southern District of Florida Finds Lost Profits Recoverable for Corporate-Competitor Plaintiffs Under FDUTPA The Chief Judge of the Southern District of Florida has ruled that corporate-competitor plaintiffs may recover lost profits under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (...)

Send a message