Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Brussels)

Caroline Janssens

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Brussels)
Senior Professional Support Lawyer

Caroline Janssens is a senior professional support lawyer in Skadden’s Brussels office, specialised in antitrust and competition law. She is a former practicing lawyer, admitted to the French-speaking bar in Brussels in 2004 and to the roll of solicitors in England and Wales in 2009. Prior to joining Skadden, Ms. Janssens worked in the London offices of other leading international law firms. She holds an LL.M. in EU and competition law from King’s College London and an LL.M. in international public law from Université Libre de Bruxelles.

Distinctions

Linked authors

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Brussels)

Articles

466 Bulletin

Bill Batchelor, Frederic Depoortere, Giorgio Motta, Ingrid Vandenborre, Aurora Luoma, Aristeidis Demiroglou, Caroline Janssens The EU Commission calls for contributions on the fundamental question of how competition rules and sustainability policies interact with each other, and what can be done better

215

Sustainability issues are increasingly high on the list of competition policy priorities both at the European Union and member state levels. The European Commission (EC) and national competition authorities are actively rethinking how competition policy can better support the transition to (...)

Ingrid Vandenborre, Caroline Janssens The England & Wales Court of Appeal imposes agency discretion in the methodology to establish the unfairness of prices, thereby increasing the burden of proof on companies to avoid a finding of excessive pricing (Pfizer / Flynn)

251

The UK Court of Appeal Overturns the CAT & Imposes Agency Discretion on Excessive Price Benchmark* On March 10, 2020, the England and Wales Court of Appeal (CoA) handed down a significant ruling that reintroduces agency discretion in the methodology used to establish the unfairness of (...)

1432 Review

Statistics


1898
Total visits

632.7
Number of readings per contribution

3
Number of contributions

Author's ranking
3033th
In number of contributions
3307th
In number of visits
3614th
In average number of visits
Send a message