Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (Amsterdam)

Alvaro Pliego Selie

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (Amsterdam)
Counsel

Alvaro is a Counsel in Freshfields’s global ACT practice, specializing in: antitrust / competition law, EU state aid and market regulation (EU single market, telecoms, tech, energy). He has acted on many international and high-profile litigious and M&A matters, including a number of appeals against the EU tax ruling decisions in the area of state aid; as well as EU cartel and merger litigation (UPS/TNT, KPN v. Commission). Another core part of Alvaro’s practice is advising clients in sectors including (online) tech, telecoms, media, FMCG and energy on complex EU regulatory matters (sector regulation, free movement, consumer protection). Before joining Freshfields in 2011, he spent five years at the Dutch Competition Authority as a member of its Legal Service.

Linked authors

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (London)
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (London)
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (London)
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (London)
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (Rome)

Articles

878 Bulletin

Thomas Lübbig, Katarzyna (Kasia) Bojarojć, Daniel Wylde, Justin Chen, Sarah Mitchell, Paul van den Berg, Alvaro Pliego Selie The EU Court of Justice rules that Article 102 TFEU permits ex post review of completed mergers at the national level, with a non-Community dimension (Towercast)

324

The European Court of Justice ( CJEU ) handed down its judgment in Towercast on 16 March 2023, confirming Advocate General Juliane Kokott’s Opinion from October 2022 that the prohibition on abuse of dominance under Article 102 TFEU is applicable to certain non-reportable mergers by dominant (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Court of Appeals for Amsterdam rules the total annulment of a public loan guarantee would not breach the legal principles of fairness and reasonableness when trying to restore the competitive landscape (Commerz)

40

For the facts of the case, please refer to the case summary of the judgment from the Supreme Court of the Netherlands, 27 May 2016 (Commerz v Rotterdam Port Authority) ECLI:NL:HR:2016:994. Taking into account the preceding judgments of the Supreme Court of the Netherlands and the Court of (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Supreme Court determines that an action by an officer of the State is not automatically an act of the State, in the context of State aid cases, instead a court must consider the broader factual background to decide imputability (Commerzbank)

28

Similar to the Residex saga, the Commerzbank judgments concerned the grant of a guarantee by the director of the Rotterdam Municipal Port Authority (GHR). On 5 November 2003, Commerzbank Nederland (Commerz) provided a credit of EUR 25 million to RDM Vehicles B.V. (RDM Vehicles), which was to be (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Supreme Court remands a case on recovery of State aid to an appellate court to determine whether a loan provider also benefited from a State guaranteed loan, or whether the recipient was the sole beneficiary (Residex)

33

After taking account of the preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice, the Supreme Court (SC) recalled that Residex argued that a declaration of nullity on the basis of Article 3:40 of the Dutch Civil Code does not lead to a restoration of the status quo ex ante as required by Article 108(3) (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch District Court of Rotterdam judges that a municipality breached State aid rules by running a ferry route and that the EU Commission should have been notified about the aid (Ferry service Gorinchem)

30

By decision of 3 February 2011, the Municipality of Gorinchem (the Municipality), the defendant, designated the implementation of the ferry route between the towns Boven Hardinxveld - Werkendam - Gorinchem - Sleeuwijk (the ferry route) as a Service of General Economic Interest (SGEI) and (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Council of State concludes, following a reference to the EU Commission, the funding of a distance learning course by the State does not breach State aid rules because the provider cannot be considered an undertaking, notwithstanding the fact that there are private operators in the market (LOI / Nederlands Talen Instituut)

23

By decision of 21 November 2008, the Minister of Education, Culture and Science refused to grant permission to the Open University of the Netherlands (OUN) to provide the part-time Higher Education (one step below university level) bachelor’s degree programme in law in the form of distance (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Administrative Court for Trade and Industry dismisses an application which claimed that the State propped up two rival healthcare providers but did not seek recovery of the aid, the claim was dismissed for absence of locus standi and that it would be contrary to the State aid control system to both find that the aid was illegal but not seek to recover it (Thuiszorgservice / Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit)

22

TZG and HWW were two foundations that provided healthcare services falling within the scope of the Exception Medical Expenses Act (the Algemene Wet Bijzondere Ziektekosten, AWBZ). TZG and HWW functioned to ensure the continuation of healthcare services of another healthcare provider which had (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Court of Appeals for Amsterdam dismisses a claim that alleges a local authority leasing a building to an undertaking constitutes State aid on the grounds that there is not sufficient evidence to suggest that the rent is not market rent (Apotheek Amerongen-Elst / Bosman / Kranenburg)

24

On 1 October 2008, the Elst Health Centre Foundation (SGE), a commercial health centre governed by general practitioners and physiotherapists, entered into a preliminary rental agreement with the Municipality of Rhenen (Municipality), the defendant, regarding the lease of certain premises for (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Administrative Court for Trade and Industry dismisses claim of negative State aid by a meat producer which sought to bring down a levy implemented to fund food safety standards on the grounds that there cannot be State aid where no State resources are in play (Compaxo Vlees Zevenaar B.V. / het Productschap Vee en Vlees)

22

From 2006 onwards, the inspection of red meat (after slaughter) in the Netherlands was no longer the responsibility of the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority, but of a separate private entity KDS. During that reorganisational period, the State decided that a new tax be (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Administrative Court for Trade and Industry dismisses an appeal by an industry association against a decision to grant an electricity company €15M on the grounds that all parties agreed that absent the payment the venture would be inviable which is undesirable because of the deals liberalising effect (VEMW)

25

The Dutch Electricity Act (Elektriciteitswet 1998) contained a provision which regulated the use of the proceeds from the auction on the Amsterdam Power Exchange Spotmarket B.V. (APX) of electricity transported across the Dutch border. This provision stated that the relevant network operator (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Council of State rejects the claim by a provider of health insurance that basing an equalisation payment on estimated healthcare costs when the real cost is known and more expensive amounts to State aid (Achmea / College voor zorgverzekeringen)

56

Each year, the Dutch Health Insurance Board (the Board) pays out an equalisation contribution to a health insurer if the latter has met its obligations to report its intention to offer and implement healthcare insurance to the Dutch Healthcare Authority. In 2008, the Board had, in accordance (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Council of State overturns a District Court judgement and declares financial contributions by municipality to pay for upkeep for a local swimming pool does not breach State aid rules because there is no effect on interstate trade (Sportgebouw Bemmel)

30

By decision of the 4 February 2009, the Municipal Executive of Lingewaard (Municipal Executive) granted a zoning plan exemption and a building permit to the municipality of Lingewaard for the construction of a sports building with a swimming facility and a fitness centre in Bemmel. The (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Supreme Court upholds the decision of the Court of Appeals of The Hague stating that a State guaranteed loan is State aid and consequently to restore competition it is necessary to examine not only the loan recipient but also the provider (Residex)

18

Residex appealed the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the Hague at the Dutch Supreme Court (SC). The SC held that there was no dispute as regards the Court of Appeals’ finding that the guarantee constituted State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU and that it should therefore have (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Supreme Court determines that a tax on airlines which start their journeys in the Netherlands does not constitute a selective advantage on airlines which merely make a stop there notwithstanding the fact that those airlines are exempt (Ryanair / Maastricht Aachen Airport)

26

Between 1 July 2008 and 1 July 2009, a so-called “flight tax” was levied on every air passenger starting their journey from the Netherlands. While the tax was levied on the airline operator, the legislator had assumed that the airlines would pass the tax onto passengers. However, because the tax (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Administrative Court for Trade and Industry rules, in a public bus State aid case, that State aid may not have breached rules in a substantive way but procedure is worthy of closer examination (Connexxion)

22

On the 24 July 2008, the municipality of Rotterdam awarded a concession for public transport by bus in Rotterdam to RET N.V. (RET) for a period of three years. The applicant, Connexxion Openbaar Vervoer N.V. (Connexxion), a private rival transport enterprise, appealed against this decision. (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Court of Appeals for The Hague upholds the first instance ruling that annulling the State loan guarantee was the correct method to recover that form of State aid and doing so would not impede the EU Commission in assessing the aid (Residex)

34

For the facts of the case, please refer to the case summary of the judgment from the Court of Rotterdam of 24 January 2007 (Residex v Municipality of Rotterdam) ECLI:NL:RBROT:2007:AZ6904. On appeal, Residex argued that the Court of Rotterdam erroneously designated RDM Aerospace as beneficiary (...)

Tim van Helfteren, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Onno Brouwer The Dutch Council of State agrees with the District Court of Maastricht that the Housing Minister cannot block a development in Belgium by a national housebuilder on the grounds that there is illegal State aid if there is no special benefit conferred on the entity which amounts to aid from the State (Woningstichting Sint Servatius)

40

Woningstichting Sint Servatius (Servatius), an approved institution within the meaning of the relevant Dutch housing laws, had applied for an authorisation from the Dutch Minister of Minister of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (the Minister) to invest in a planned, cross-border (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch District Court of Rotterdam nullifies a loan guarantee to a financial services firm which lent money to a aerospace company for breaching the standstill obligation under EU State aid law (Residex)

35

In 2001, Residex Capital IV C.V. (Residex) acquired shares in MD Helicopters Holding N.V. (MDH), a subsidiary of RDM Aerospace N.V. (RDM Aerospace). As part of this transaction, Residex obtained an option to resell the shares in MDH to RDM Aerospace. Residex exercised this put option by letter (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Court of Appeals for Amsterdam rejects an application contending that a telecommunications joint venture between a local authority and private entities constituted State aid because State involvement did not have a de-risking affect to a material degree (UCP)

17

In 1995, UPC, a (former) provider of broadband, telephony, and television services in the Netherlands, acquired the Amsterdam cable network. In 2004, the Municipality of Amsterdam decided to install a fiber optic network (Citynet) in three layers. In the same year, the Municipality started the (...)

Onno Brouwer, Alvaro Pliego Selie, Tim van Helfteren The Dutch Court of Appeals for Amsterdam rules that a company cannot be tortiously liable for receiving a benefit from the State which allegedly breach State aid rules, unless that benefit has been assessed by the EU Commission and is found to contravene the rules and the company goes on to accept the benefit regardless (Baby Dan / WeDeKa / De Risse)

29

Baby Dan was a producer of stair gates who had a dispute with its competitor Bruca c.s. (consisting of the entities WeDeKa, De Risse, Bruca and Sluis Groep) concerning, among other things, an alleged copyright infringement of one of Baby Dan’s brand names and unfair competition from Bruca c.s. (...)

Send a message