Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)

Daniel P. Culley

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
Partner

Daniel Culley’s practice focuses on antitrust counseling and antitrust litigation. His work includes counseling, merger control, antitrust litigation, and civil and criminal government investigations, particularly for high-tech industries and two-sided markets. Daniel has represented clients in federal and state courts and advised clients in both criminal and civil investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice, the FTC, state agencies, and the European Commission. Daniel joined the firm in 2008 and became partner in the Washington, D.C. office in 2017. Since the beginning of 2018, he splits his time between the Washington and Brussels offices.

Distinctions

Linked authors

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Cologne)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Hong Kong)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (London)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Brussels)

Articles

880 Bulletin

Leah Brannon, Brian R. Byrne, Jeremy J. Calsyn, George S. Cary, Daniel P. Culley, Elaine Ewing, David I. Gelfand, Bruce Hoffman, Heather Nyong’o, Kenneth Reinker The US FTC and DoJ announce plans to review and update merger guidelines in order to strengthen enforcement against illegal mergers

213

On Tuesday, January 18th, FTC Chair Lina Khan and DOJ Antitrust Division Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter held a joint press conference in which they announced ambitious plans to review and update the Merger Guidelines, targeting a release of new guidelines before the end of 2022. (...)

Leah Brannon, Brian R. Byrne, Jeremy J. Calsyn, George S. Cary, Alexis Collins, Daniel P. Culley, Elaine Ewing, David I. Gelfand, Bruce Hoffman, Mark W. Nelson, Kenneth Reinker The US FTC issues commentary on vertical merger enforcement explaining the approach to assessing the competitive effects of vertical mergers

85

On December 22, 2020, the US Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) issued a Commentary on Vertical Merger Enforcement. This follows the recent issuance of revised Vertical Merger Guidelines published jointly by the FTC and Department of Justice (the “Agencies”) on June 30, 2020. While the Guidelines (...)

Maurits J. F. M. Dolmans, Daniel P. Culley, David Herrington, Jessica Hollis, Alexandra Theobald The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reverses a ruling finding that a semiconductor company abuses its dominant position regarding its standard-essential patents (Qualcomm)

184

On August 11, 2020, a Ninth Circuit panel reversed the District Court for the Northern District of California’s judgment in FTC v. Qualcomm, Inc. The panel held that Qualcomm’s conduct—(a) refusing to license its standards essential patents (SEPs) to rival chipset manufacturers; (b) refusing to (...)

Amélie Champsaur, Daniel P. Culley, François-Charles Laprévote, Till Mueller-Ibold The EU Commission approves a COVID-19 related measure aimed at compensating event organizers for losses caused by the cancellation

220

Recognizing the serious economic consequences that the COVID-19 crisis may create, on March 12 the Commission approved within 24 hours of notification a COVID-19 related measure in Denmark aimed at compensating event organizers for losses caused by cancellations. Following this initial ad hoc (...)

1650 Review

Send a message