Weil, Gotshal & Manges (New York)

Wendy Fu

Weil, Gotshal & Manges (New York)
Lawyer (Associate)

Wendy Fu is an associate in the Antitrust/Competition practice group in Weil’s New York office. Ms. Fu’s practice focuses on government investigations and civil litigation, and she has been involved in representing clients in a range of industries, including pharmaceuticals, automobile components, chemicals, healthcare, technology, and television broadcasting. Ms. Fu also has experience in the antitrust/intellectual property area and has been involved in counseling technology and pharmaceutical clients on the antitrust implications of patent pools, standard setting organizations, and patent litigation. Ms. Fu is a member of the Intellectual Property Committee of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association and contributes regularly to committee’s news bulletins. She has also written articles on topics such as global cartel investigations and patent licensing. Ms. Fu received her J.D. from Cornell Law School, where she was an editor of the Cornell International Law Journal. She received her undergraduate degree with honors from the University of California at Berkeley.

Contact

Linked authors

Weil, Gotshal & Manges (Washington)
United States 1 contribution 174 visits
Weil, Gotshal & Manges (Washington)
United States 3 contributions 517 visits
Weil, Gotshal & Manges (Brussels)
Belgium 2 contributions 723 visits
Weil, Gotshal & Manges (Washington)
United States 2 contributions 998 visits
Weil, Gotshal & Manges (Washington)
United States 1 contribution 149 visits

Articles

929 Bulletin

Wendy Fu The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit holds that import trade automatically falls within the scope of the Sherman Act and is not excluded by the FTAIA and that, under the Alternative Fine Statute, “gross gain” means gains by all participants in a conspiracy (AU Optronics)

221

Ninth Circuit Weighs in on FTAIA and Alternative Fine Statute* The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed a $500 million fine for AU Optronics (“AUO”) in the long-running liquid crystal display panel cartel case, and clarified its interpretation of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (...)

Wendy Fu The US Supreme Court grants certiorari and will soon decide whether a case that has been dismissed from a consolidated proceeding can be appealed immediately, notwithstanding other cases still pending in the same proceeding (Gelboim / Bank of America)

171

Supreme Court to Review Appeal Issue in LIBOR Litigation* Introduction The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp. and will soon decide whether a case that has been dismissed from a consolidated proceeding can be appealed immediately, notwithstanding other (...)

Wendy Fu The US District Court for the Eastern District of New York further cements the Second Circuit Courts’ position in favor of not requiring market power to establish a vertical restraint (American Express)

138

Eastern District of New York Declines to Make Market Power a Requirement in Vertical Restraint Cases In United States v. American Express Co., et al., Eastern District of New York Judge Nicholas Garaufis held that, in the absence of further direction from the Supreme Court or the Second (...)

Craig Zieminski, Eric S. O’Connor, John Gregory Butler, Katherine Ambrogi, Lee Roach, Matthew R. Maddox, Wendy Fu The US FTC requires divestiture of production and intellectual property assets before clearing an acquisition in the market for desktop hard drives (Western Digital / Hitachi GST)

399

On May 8, 2012, Western Digital Corporation (“Western Digital”) completed its acquisition of Viviti Technologies (formerly, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Ltd., or, “Hitachi GST”) for approximately $4.8 billion, after the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) approved a consent order requiring (...)

Send a message