Thomas Vinje
Clifford Chance (Brussels)
Lawyer (Partner)
Thomas Vinje specializes in European Union competition and intellectual property law, especially in high-technology matters. Advises major corporations regarding mergers, joint ventures, distribution systems, licensing, and competition and intellectual property litigation. Particular experience in advising in relation to the information and communications technology industries. Thomas speaks regularly on European Union intellectual property and antitrust law, and has authored numerous articles and contributions to books on those topics. He chairs the U.S. Board of Editors for Droit de l’Informatique et des Telecoms and sits on the Board of Editors for Computer und Recht International. He lectures in the International Copyright programme at the University of Amsterdam and in the International Business Law Postgraduate Program at the University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Distinctions
Linked authors
Marcin Bartnicki
Clifford Chance (Warsaw)
Richard Blewett
Clifford Chance (Beijing)
Julia Collinet
Clifford Chance (Paris)
Timothy Cornell
Clifford Chance (Washington D.C.)
Luciano Di Via
Clifford Chance (Milano)
2960 | Conferences
Videos
Articles
380 Bulletin
42
This article has been nominated for the 2020 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. On 14 February 2019, the EU General Court annulled the European Commission’s State aid decision relating to the Belgian excess profit ruling system. The General (...)
338
The information technology ("IT") sector has proven to be fertile ground for investigations of abuses of market power (otherwise referred to as "monopolization" and "monopoly maintenance" under Section 2 of the Sherman Act in the United States, or "abuses of dominance" under Article 102 TFEU in (...)
974 Review
974
Competition Law and Regulation of Technology Markets takes a practical,integrated approach to EU and US competition law and regulation in the technology sector - including major trans-Atlantic cases such as Microsoft, Google/Doubleclick, and Intel, and important comparative issues such as (...)
