Contact

Richard Pike

Constantine Cannon (London)

Partner

Richard Pike is a partner in the firm’s Antitrust Litigation and Counselling Practice Group. His practice covers a broad range of litigation and counselling. He specialises in antitrust litigation and regulatory appeals, particularly in relation to telecommunications. Mr Pike has considerable experience before the Competition Appeal Tribunal and Competition Commission as well as before the High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and Privy Council. M.r Pike is recommended in Chambers UK 2014, Chambers Global 2014 and the Lawyer 500. He also led a team that jointly won Competition and Regulatory Team of the Year at The Lawyer Awards 2012. Before joining Constantine Cannon, Mr Pike spent 14 years with Baker & McKenzie LLP, including 4 years as a litigation partner in its London office and a year in its Chicago office.

Distinctions

Nominee, 2019 Antitrust Writing Awards: Academic, Private Enforcement

Nominee, 2015 Antitrust Writing Awards: Business, Private Enforcement

Winner, 2013 Antitrust Writing Awards: Business, Anticompetitive Practices

AWA 2019 Logo Nominated nom-2015 win-2013

Contact

Linked authors

Keith Jones

Baker McKenzie (London)

United Kingdom 5 contributions 2096 visits

Tom Cassels

Linklaters (London)

United Kingdom 1 contribution 235 visits

Francesca Richmond

Baker McKenzie (London)

United Kingdom 1 contribution 235 visits

Alexander Gee

DG COMP (Brussels)

Belgium 4 contributions 5449 visits

Ariel Ezrachi

University of Oxford

United Kingdom 11 contributions 23162 visits

Cristina Caffarra

CRA International (London)

United Kingdom 19 contributions 23450 visits

Jeffrey Shinder

Constantine Cannon (New York)

United States 2 contributions 625 visits

Ana Rojo Prada

King’s College (London)

United Kingdom 2 contributions 465 visits

527 | Conferences

9 Oct 2014 London The MasterCard ECJ Judgement: What does it mean for the litigation and regulatory challenges facing payment cards? See documents

Articles

3005 Bulletin

Richard Pike, Yulia Tosheva The EU Commission sends a statement of objections to a technology company suspected of imposing restrictions on device manufacturers and mobile network operators (Google Android)

20 April 2016 256

EU Commission Hits Google With Abuse Of Dominance Charges Over Android*Just as expected, following a one-year investigation and a number of information requests, the European Commission formally announced today that it is accusing Google’s parent company, Alphabet, of abusing its dominant (...)

Richard Pike, Yulia Tosheva The EU Commission opens a preliminary investigation in relation to possible collusion in the money transfer market (Western Union)

23 February 2016 432

EU telegraphs it is probing whether Western Union colluded to drive rivals out of money-transfer market*The European Commission has reportedly launched a preliminary antitrust investigation into possible collusion by Western Union in the money remittance market.According to sources, the (...)

Richard Pike, Yulia Tosheva The UK High Court throws out private claim for damages based on abuse of dominance in the online mapping sector (Streetmap / Google)

12 February 2016 184

Google wins court battle against StreetMap in the UK*Google won a big victory Friday in the High Court of England and Wales, which ruled that Google did not abuse its dominant position to the detriment of the now-defunct UK online mapping provider, Streetmap.The Court’s ruling against (...)

Irene Fraile, Richard Pike The UK Competition and Markets Authority fines pharmaceutical companies for pay-for-delay deals (GSK)

12 February 2016 268

UK Antitrust Watchdog slaps $65 million fine on Pharma Companies in UK’s first pay-for-delay case*On 12 February 2016, the Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”), UK’s competition regulator, fined a number of pharma companies for anti-competitive conduct and agreements in relation to the supply (...)

Richard Pike, Yulia Tosheva The EU Commission announces two investigations against a chipmaker company for predatory pricing and rebates (Qualcomm)

16 July 2015 377

European Commission Doubles Down On Antitrust Investigations Against Giant U.S. Chipmaker Qualcomm* The European Commission (“EC”) announced yesterday it has opened two antitrust investigations into possible abusive behavior by the U.S. technology company Qualcomm, the world’s largest supplier of (...)

Richard Pike, Yulia Tosheva The EU Commission fines cargo train operators in a cartel settlement (Express Interfracht / Schenker)

15 July 2015 703

European Commission Slams Cargo Train Operators With 49 Million Euro Fine In Cartel Settlement* The European Commission (“EC”) today imposed fines totalling 49,154,000 euros on Express Interfracht, part of the Austrian railway company Österreichische Bundesbahnen, and Schenker, a subsidiary of (...)

Richard Pike The UK Parliament passes the Consumer Rights Bill introducing opt-out antitrust class actions

26 March 2015 235

UK Passes Consumer Rights Bill Introducing Opt-Out Antitrust Class Actions* The United Kingdom announced today that the Consumer Rights Bill has passed its final legislative hurdle and has been adopted as the Consumer Rights Act 2015 – heralding a major overhaul of consumer protection law in (...)

Ana Rojo Prada, Richard Pike The European Commission fines fives companies over € 19.4 million in cartel settlement for price coordination and customer allocation (Envelopes)

11 December 2014 315

European Commission Seeks To Stamp Out Envelope Cartel With Fines Totaling 19.48 Million Euros* The European Commission has announced that it has imposed fines totaling 19.48 million euros on five European envelope producers for coordinating prices and allocating customers through an (...)

Francesca Richmond, Keith Jones, Richard Pike, Tom Cassels The English High Court orders disclosure of parts of the unredacted version of the EU Commission’s switchgear cartel decision (National Grid / ABB)

4 April 2012 235

*Antitrust Litigation: Access to Documents Held by Regulatory Authorities The English High Court has confirmed that the principles established by the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "ECJ") in Pfleiderer apply to the disclosure of leniency documents submitted to the (...)