Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)

Peter E. Greene

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
Lawyer (Partner)

Peter E. Greene is partner in the antitrust/competition group of Skaden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (New York office). He handles litigation and advisory antitrust matters, including class action litigation, mergers and acquisitions, and appellate matters. For example, Mr. Greene represented The American Stock Exchange, LLC in the Stock Exchanges Options Trading class action litigation; Chase Manhattan Bank in the Lum v. Bank of America, et al. class action litigation; JP Morgan Chase in the Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust class action litigation, in the Ross v. Bank of America, et al. antitrust litigation, and in the Payment Card Interchange Fee class action antitrust litigation; Chase Paymentech Solutions, LLC in Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., v. Micros Systems, Inc., et al.; Prudential Securities, Inc. in the Friedman, et al. v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., et al. class action litigation; OEA in the Daicel Chemicals v. OEA International Chamber of Commerce arbitration; Archipelago Securities in arbitrations involving The Island ECN and Instinet; Autoliv, Inc. in the Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc. litigation; and Viacom Inc. in the MCA Inc. v. Viacom Inc. litigation and in the Morrison v. Viacom class action litigation.

Distinctions

Linked authors

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Brussels)

Articles

365 Bulletin

Gary A. MacDonald, Paul Eckles, Peter E. Greene, Steven C. Sunshine The US Supreme Court reverses class action certification raising hurdles for antitrust collective redress cases (Wal-Mart Stores / Dukes)

365

This article has been nominated for the 2012 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. On June 20, 2011, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision holding that discrimination claims on behalf of (...)

Statistics


365
Total visits

365
Number of readings per contribution

1
Number of contributions

Author's ranking
5431th
In number of contributions
6401th
In number of visits
4941th
In average number of visits
Send a message