Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (London)

Nicholas Levy

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (London)
Partner

Nicholas Levy is a partner based in the Brussels and London offices of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton. Mr. Levy’s practice focuses on EU and UK antitrust law. He has extensive experience in notifying mergers and joint ventures under the EU Merger Regulation, coordinating the notification of international transactions, and advising on all aspects of antitrust law, including anti-cartel enforcement, collaborative arrangements, vertical agreements and unilateral conduct. He has been involved in a number of leading Merger Regulation cases, including DuPont/ICI, Procter & Gamble/VP Schickedanz (II), Kimberly-Clark/Scott Paper, Coca-Cola Enterprises/Amalgamated Beverages GB, Blokker/Toys “R” US, Alcoa/Reynolds, General Electric/Honeywell, Sony/BMG, Inco/Falconbridge, Abbott Laboratories/Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Deutsche Börse/NYSE Euronext, UTC/Goodrich, Ryanair/Aer Lingus (III), Lafarge/Holcim, IMS Health/Quintiles, Johnson Controls/Tyco International, Abbott/St. Jude Medical, Sony/EMI Music Publishing. Mr. Levy is consistently recognized as one of the leading antitrust lawyers in Europe. He has written and spoken widely, and has authored a two-volume treatise entitled European Merger Control Law: A Guide to the Merger Regulation, published by LexisNexis. Mr. Levy joined Cleary Gottlieb in 1990 and became a partner in 1999. He is a graduate of Oxford University and the City University of London. He is a member of the Bar in England and Wales and in Brussels and a solicitor of the Senior Courts of England and Wales. His native language is English.

Distinctions

Linked authors

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Hong Kong)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Brussels)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Washington)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (London)
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton (Milan)

Videos

Nicholas LEVY (Cleary Gottlieb)
Nicholas Levy 19 May 2022 London
Nicholas Levy (Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton)
Nicholas Levy 26 October 2018 New York
Nicholas Levy (Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton)
Nicholas Levy 23 February 2018 London
Nicholas Levy - Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
Nicholas Levy 14 April 2015 Washington DC

Articles

12881 Bulletin

Nicholas Levy Mergers & Judicial review: An overview of EU and national case law

856

The EU Courts have played an important role in the evolution of the EU Merger Regulation (the “EUMR”), acting as an effective check on its application by the European Commission (the “Commission”), exerting discipline over Commission decisions in the same way as U.S. courts discipline the U.S. federal agencies’ determinations of whether mergers should be allowed to proceed. In recent years, as described further below, the EU Courts have rendered a number of important judgements that, among other things, have clarified the Commission’s application of the EUMR’s substantive test (i.e., whether a concentration will significantly impede effective competition) to “gap” cases (i.e., horizontal mergers that will not create or strengthen a dominant position but nevertheless raise unilateral effects concerns) and confirmed the Commission’s March 2021 policy of encouraging national competition agencies to refer transactions to the Commission under Article 22 of the EUMR that do not meet the relevant national merger control thresholds but nevertheless threaten to have significant anti-competitive effects in the EU. This Foreword describes the EU Courts’ contribution to merger control and identifies some of the leading judgments rendered at the national level, where courts have also played an active role in shaping merger control.

Nicholas Levy, Henry Mostyn, Paul Stuart, Patrick Todd The EU General Court partially annuls the Commission’s decision against a Big Tech company for non-price-based abuses of dominance (Google Android)

865

In September 2022, the General Court partially annulled the European Commission’s 2018 Google Android decision, which fined Google €4.3 billion for abuses of dominance relating to apps it offers for its Android mobile operating system (“OS”). The Court also found that the Commission’s (...)

Nicholas Levy, Francisco Enrique González-Díaz, Lydia Bitsakou, Brian Cullen The EU Commission blocks an acquisition of a nascent biotech firm which is developing a promising cancer detection technology by a large American biotech company notwithstanding the fact that the transaction fails to reach the requisite merger thresholds (Illumina / Grail)

231

In a landmark decision announced on September 6, 2022 (“Decision”), the European Commission (“EC”) prohibited the acquisition by Illumina, a U.S. company specialising in genomic sequencing, of GRAIL, a U.S.- based start-up developing early cancer-detection tests (“Transaction”). The EC (...)

Nicholas Levy, Andris Rimsa, Chloe Hassard, Bianca Buzatu The EU General Court upholds the Commission’s merger referral policy, thereby expanding the Commission’s jurisdiction over non-reportable transactions (Illumina / Grail)

126

In a significant judgment rendered on July 13, 2022 (“Judgment”), the EU’s General Court validated the position taken by the European Commission (“EC”) in a March 2021 Guidance Paper encouraging national competition authorities (“NCAs”) to use Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation (“EUMR”) to (...)

Nicholas Levy, Maurits Dolmans, Jackie Holland, Tihir Sarkar, Sam Bagot, Nallini Puri, Paul Gilbert, John Messent, Michael J. Preston, Michael James The UK Government announces the date of the coming into operation of the National Security and Investment Act, one of the most wide-ranging regimes for review of investments on national security grounds in the world

306

On 20 July 2021, the UK Government announced that the National Security and Investment Act 2021, which was passed on 29 April 2021, will come into force on 4 January 2022. This new regime for review of investments on national security grounds will be among the most wide-ranging in the world. (...)

Nicholas Levy, Paul Gilbert, Lanto Sheridan, Jackie Holland, Fay Davies, Sarah Peel The UK Government consults on its ambitious reform of national competition policy, including on changes to allow the Government to play a more active role in shaping national competition policy and to increase the Competition Authority’s investigative and enforcement powers

357

On 20 July 2021, the UK Government launched its consultation on wide-ranging reforms to “bring [the UK’s] competition and consumer policies into the 21st century” [1] (the “Consultation”). While recognising that the UK’s competition regime “starts from a strong foundation” and “is (...)

Nicholas Levy, Paul Gilbert, Alexander Waksman, Ranulf Outhwaite, Courtney Olden The UK Parliament publishes an independent report on the state of national competition law

382

On 16 February 2021, John Penrose MP published an independent report on improving competition and consumer protection in the UK (the Report). It finds that the UK’s competition and consumer regime “has a good reputation, but not a great one”; progress on “cutting the costs of red tape” has (...)

Nicholas Levy, Maurits Dolmans, Paul Gilbert, John Messent, Esther Kelly, Nallini Puri, Tihir Sarkar, Sam Bagot, Courtenay Stock The UK Government introduces a national screening regime for foreign investments

538

On November 11, the UK Government proposed a new national security screening regime that would allow the Government to intervene in “potentially hostile” foreign investments that threatened UK national security while “ensuring the UK remains a global champion of free trade and an attractive (...)

Jonathan Kelly, Nicholas Levy, Paul Gilbert, Paul Stuart, Fay Davies The England & Wales Court of Appeal clarifies the ability of parties that settle EU Commission antitrust investigations to challenge the Commission’s findings in follow-on damages actions (Trucks Cartel)

227

The Court of Appeal has handed down an important judgment clarifying the ability of parties that settle European Commission (Commission) antitrust investigations to challenge the Commission’s findings in follow-on damages actions. The judgment concerns an appeal relating to a preliminary (...)

Nicholas Levy, Maurits Dolmans, Francisco Enrique González-Díaz, Romina Polley, Patrick Bock The EU Commission announces new policy to accept Member State referrals for merger review even if EC and national thresholds are not met

166

In September 2020, Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager announced that from mid-2021 the European Commission (“EC”) would “start accepting referrals from national competition authorities of mergers that are worth reviewing at the EU level – whether or not those authorities had the power (...)

Nicholas Levy, Maurits Dolmans, Romano F. Subiotto, Paul Gilbert, Richard Pepper, Paul Stuart, John Messent The UK Government prohibits acquisition of a national supplier of military aircraft components on national security grounds (Gardner Aerospace / Impcross)

203

On 5 September 2020, the UK Government accepted undertakings from Gardner Aerospace Holdings Limited not to proceed with its proposed acquisition of Impcross Limited, a UK-based manufacturer of components for the aerospace industry (including for military aircraft). Gardner is owned by (...)

Maurits Dolmans, Nicholas Levy, Romano F. Subiotto, Paul Gilbert, Richard Pepper The UK Competition Authority consults on amending guidance on applications for leniency and no-action in cartel cases

126

The CMA’s Guidance on applications for leniency and no-action in cartel cases provides detailed guidance on the principles and process for leniency applications. On 30 July 2020, the CMA invited comments on a proposed addendum to clarify the way the CMA will exercise its discretion in relation (...)

John Messent, Paul Stuart, Richard Pepper, Paul Gilbert, Nicholas Levy, Maurits Dolmans The UK Government introduces measures allowing it to intervene in merger transactions to mitigate the effects of public health emergencies following the COVID-19 pandemic

465

On 22 June 2020, the UK Government introduced new measures allowing it to intervene in merger transactions “to maintain in the United Kingdom the capability to combat, and to mitigate the effects of, public health emergencies." The Government will be able to intervene on these grounds in any (...)

Francisco Enrique González-Díaz, Patrick Bock, Nicholas Levy, Marco D’Ostuni, Séverine Schrameck, Richard Pepper The EU General Court overturns the EU Commission’s prohibition of a mobile telecommunications merger (Telefónica UK / Hutchison 3G UK)

265

In a landmark Judgment delivered on May 28, the General Court overturned the European Commission’s 2016 prohibition of the Three/O2 UK mobile telecommunications merger. The Judgment raises the bar for the Commission in respect of (1) the legal standard the Commission must meet; (2) the (...)

Francisco Enrique González-Díaz, Patrick Bock, Bernd Langeheine, Richard Pepper, Nicholas Levy, Marco D’Ostuni, Séverine Schrameck The EU General Court raises the Commission’s bar for mergers in concentrated markets (Telefónica UK / Hutchison 3G UK)

65

In a landmark Judgment delivered on May 28, the General Court overturned the European Commission’s 2016 prohibition of the Three/O2 UK mobile telecommunications merger. The Judgment raises the bar for the Commission in respect of (1) the legal standard the Commission must meet; (2) the (...)

Maurits Dolmans, Alexander Waksman, Nicholas Levy, Wanjie Lin, Romi Lepetska The UK Competition Tribunal publishes a summary of an application to commence collective proceedings for losses arising from a settlement decision finding infringements of article 101 TFEU in the automobile market (Mark McLaren)

152

On 1 April 2020, the CAT published a summary of an application to commence collective proceedings under section 47B of the Competition Act 1998. The application was filed by Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited, a special purpose vehicle, alleging losses arising from the European (...)

Edward Crane, Aurèle Delors, John Messent, Francesco Iodice, Mirko von Bieberstein, Michael J. Ulmer, Giuseppe Scassellati-Sforzolini, Nicholas Levy, François-Charles Laprévote, Richard Pepper, Konstantin Bondarenko The EU Commission issues guidance on the screening of foreign direct investments in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

1156

In a March 25, 2020 communication, the European Commission (“EC”) issued guidance on the screening of foreign direct investments (“FDI”) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The communication identifies an increased risk of attempts by non-EU acquirers to obtain control over suppliers of (...)

Nicholas Levy, Maurits Dolmans, Paul Gilbert, John Messent The UK Competition Authority issues a statement which stipulates that the UK government will suspend elements of its antitrust laws and will refocuses enforcement in response to COVID-19

23

The UK Government, the Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”) and sectoral regulators are taking measures to respond to COVID-19, including suspending certain elements of competition law to allow competing suppliers of essential products and services to work together, while monitoring (...)

Nicholas Levy Judicial review of merger decisions: An overview of EU and national case law

2004

I came to Brussels to practise competition law a week after the EU Merger Regulation (the “EUMR”) [1] entered into force in 1990 and can well remember the antitrust community’s sense of expectation, trepidation, and excitement. Expectation because of the long period of gestation that followed the Court of Justice’s judgment in Continental Can [2] and the uncertainty around the European Commission’s (the “Commission’s”) ability to implement an EU-wide system of merger control. Trepidation because of the significant practical challenges, open questions of law, and untested principles that were raised by the EUMR. Excitement because of the realization that the practice of EU competition law would almost certainly be permanently and materially changed. Among the many open questions was the role that would be played by the EU Courts and the scope for effective and timely judicial review of Commission decisions.

Sunil Gadhia, Nicholas Levy, Paul Gilbert, David Little, Vassilena Karadakova, Jonathan Kelly, James Brady-Banzet The UK FCA fines companies sharing strategic information on a bilateral basis during an initial public offering (Hargreave / Newton / RAMAM)

2212

This article has been nominated for the 2020 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. On 21 February, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) found that Hargreave Hale Ltd (“Hargreave Hale”), Newton Investment Management Limited (...)

Maurits Dolmans, Romi Lepetska, Nicholas Levy, Alexander Waksman, Romano F. Subiotto, Wanjie Lin, Paul Gilbert The UK Competition Authority in a series of gun jumping enforcement actions, imposes a fine of £200,000 on an electronics company for gun jumping (Electro Rent)

27

UK Clamps Down On Gun-Jumping On 12 February 2019, the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) imposed a fine of £200,000 on Electro Rent for gun-jumping. [1] This is the third occasion on which the CMA has penalised a company for breaching “standstill” or “hold-separate” obligations (...)

Christopher J. Cook, Francisco Enrique González-Díaz, François-Charles Laprévote, Maurits Dolmans, Nicholas Levy, Thomas Graf The EU Commission fines a company for providing incorrect or misleading information during its investigations on a merger (Facebook / WhatsApp)

1342

On May 18, 2017, the European Commission (the “Commission”) fined Facebook €110 million for providing incorrect or misleading information during its 2014 investigation of its acquisition of WhatsApp The magnitude of the fine dwarfs the few penalties the Commission has imposed in the past for (...)

9325 Review

Frederic Jenny, Damien Neven, Jacques Buhart, David Henry, Thomas Funke, Mathew Heim, Catarina Midões, Nicholas Levy, David Little, Henry Mostyn, Ioannis Lianos, Massimo Motta, Martin Peitz, Cristoforo Osti, Almos Papp, Christian Wik, Kristian Hugmark, Julia Vahvaselkä, Antoine Winckler, Thierry Boillot Which competition and industrial policies for the new EU Commission after Siemens/Alstom?

7454

This series of articles presents different points of view about the priorities of the newly established Commission on competition policy in Europe in the aftermath of the decision prohibiting the Siemens/Alstom merger and of the manifesto published by French and German governments. These (...)

Books

Statistics


38702
Total visits

1209.4
Number of readings per contribution

32
Number of contributions

Author's ranking
304th
In number of contributions
242th
In number of visits
2255th
In average number of visits
Send a message