White & Case (Brussels)

Nicholas Forwood

White & Case (Brussels)
Lawyer (Partner)

Sir Nicholas Forwood was called to the English Bar in 1970. After eight years’ practice in London, he moved to Brussels in 1979 to set up a new chambers of barristers specializing in EU and competition law. Over the next twenty years, he practised extensively in this field, before both the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance (now the General Court of the EU), where he pleaded regularly both for corporate and individual clients as well as for the Community institutions. His cases covered the whole range of antitrust, particularly those with global reach (Wood pulp, Soda Ash, PVC LDPE, John Deere, IBM, Racal Decca, Hilti. Tetra Pak), transport and shipping (FEFC, TACA, B&I Sealink), and mergers as well as State aid. Also called to the Irish bar in 1982, and made Queen’s Counsel in 1987, he was appointed to the CJEU as a judge of the Court of First Instance of the EC in December 1999. Over the following 16 years as a judge of the General Court, Nicholas Forwood took part in many of the General Court’s leading judgments, dealing with more than 1500 cases, 464 of which were as reporting judge. In the competition field, these included the trio of judgments in 2002 (Airtours, Tetra-Laval and Schneider) that led to a fundamental restructuring of the Commission’s merger task force, the review of the Commission’s GE/Honeywell merger decision, the Microsoft (2007) and Microsoft (2012) cases on abuse of dominant position, in the latter as reporting judge, as well as numerous cartel cases, including JFE Engineering. In other fields, he was reporting judge in the earliest judgments concerning judicial review of sanctions and restrictive measures against suspected terrorists and organisations (PMOI, Kadi), in some 100 or so cases involving State aid, including several leading judgments, and in relation to EU IP law (trademarks, designs, plant variety rights), and the FIFA/UEFA cases on the broadcasting rights for the World Cup and European Cup, Other areas of experience include anti-dumping and other trade protection measures, common agricultural policy and environmental cases. At White & Case, Sir Nicholas will focus on providing high-level advice and oversight in the most significant cases in the field of EU law, particularly competition. He is also a door tenant at Brick Court Chambers, where he will concentrate on acting as an arbitrator, on the provision of independent expert opinions, arbitration and occasional advice.


Linked authors

White & Case (Brussels)
White & Case (Washington)
White & Case (Boston)
White & Case (Riyadh)
White & Case (New York)


6939 Bulletin

Nicholas Forwood, Jérémie Jourdan, Cornelius Börner Judicial review & burden of proof in unilateral practice cases: An overview of EU and national case law


The timing of this latest work in the impressive series of Concurrences projects could hardly have been more apt. 2020 was a bumper year, in both EU and national courts, for judgments involving judicial review of enforcement decisions in unilateral cases. At the same time, however, of the most significant unilateral cases pending before the General Court, three – Intel (on renvoi), Google (shopping) and Google (Android) are, at the time of writing, still in délibéré, with judgments expected later this year or next. Lawyers, economists and, above all, businesses at risk of being regarded as dominant, especially in the digital sector, will be looking to the judgments in these cases, each of which has its distinctive facts, to clarify the analytical framework for determining whether, and specifically why, unilateral conduct of a dominant undertaking crosses the – sometimes all too obscure – line into transgression. It, therefore, seemed to the Editors that, while waiting for these three judgments (and then, in all probability, the results of any appeals), many practitioners might find it useful to look back over recent years to see how the judicial review of decisions of competition authorities, both Commission and national (NCAs), has evolved.

Ian Forrester, Nicholas Forwood Due process in European law: a post-judicial view


We each began professional life as advocates, zealous in our support of the causes upon which we were engaged. Each of us had the huge good fortune to work on big cases with good teachers, giants of the bar, and then the even huger fortune to work in professional maturity with skilled (...)

2004 Review

Andreas Mundt, Christophe Lemaire, Nicholas Forwood, Richard Whish TR IV - Anticompetitive object vs. anticompetitive effect: Does it really matter? (New Frontiers of Antitrust Conference - Paris, 10 February 2012)


The fourth roundtable of the conference “New frontiers of Antitrust”, Paris, 10 February 2012, was dedicated to the distinction between anticompetitive object and anticompetitive effect. In the first contribution, Richard Whish, Professor at the King’s College of London, provides some (...)



Total visits

Number of readings per contribution

Number of contributions

Author's ranking
In number of contributions
In number of visits
In average number of visits
Send a message