Nadine Mouy
Regional Economic Service of the French Embassy (Finland)
Chief Economist
Nadine Mouy is Chief Economist at the Regional Economic Service of the French Embassy in Helsinki, Finland. This Service is part of the international network of the French Treasury, depending of the Ministry of Economy, Economic Recovery and Digital sector, and the Ministry of Finance and Public Accounts. Previously, Nadine Mouy was head of the Mergers Unit at the french Autorité de la concurrence. Graduated from the Ecole Nationale d’Administration in 1994, she joined the Competition Council in 1998 after four years with the forecasting division of the french Ministry of economics, finance and industry. She was previously Deputy General Case Officer notably in charge of mergers in-depth analysis and telecommunications cases as well as other complex antitrust cases that mix law and economics. In 2009, she took over the Authority’s merger unit created following the 2008 competition law reform that transferred the entire competency for merger control to the newly created Autorité de la concurrence.
Linked authors
Jean-Paul Tran Thiet
JPTT & Partners (Paris)
Vincent Thouvenin
Reseau de transport d’electricite (RTE)
Christophe Barthélémy
CMS Bureau Francis Lefebvre (Paris)
Antoine Chapsal
Analysis Group (Paris)
David Tayar
Clifford Chance (Paris)
Nathalie Jalabert-Doury
Mayer Brown (Paris)
Thomas Hoehn
Imperial College Business School (London)
Matthew Gaved
Added Value Capital Partners (AVCP) (Royston)
562 | Conferences
Articles
24175 Review
800
The pre-notification phase has proved to be a useful mean to address “upfront” many of the issues that a concentration may raise, without being bound by the strict timetable of the formal review process. It works well but there is arguably still some room for improvement. La procédure de (...)
471
This set of three papers is derived from the training session organized by the Concurrences Review that was held on 10th July 2012 in Paris. The contributions examine the case of multiple notifications in the context of merger control rules. Concentrations : Comment gérer les notifications (...)
1639
The Ryanair/Aer Lingus case has recently revived a debate regarding the need for an ex ante review by competition authorities of the acquisition of minority shareholdings. Indeed, the concept of "control", which is used by a majority of the competition authorities, is in essence an ill-suited (...)
3680
L’une des premières questions que l’on se pose naturellement est celle de la portée juridique de ces LD, telle qu’expliquée aux paragraphes 12 et 13, que ce soit vis-à-vis de l’ADLC ou vis-à-vis des entreprises qui vont l’invoquer. Pouvez-vous nous en dire un mot ? Quelles sont, de façon synthétique (...)
8026
The credibility of the system of merger control relies on the fact that firms comply with the remedies. The importance of this issue has been increased by the development of behavioural remedies and by the increasing complexity of the different types of structural remedies. In this context, the (...)
9559
The incremental costs test is now currently used by the competition authorities. However, the various criteria of this test are subject of intense debates among scholars and practionners. This article gathers four different points of view on this issue, among which an economist, a lawyer, a (...)
