Jones Day (Cleveland)

Michelle K. Fischer

Jones Day (Cleveland)
Partner

For more than 30 years, Michelle Fischer has tried, litigated, and counseled on a broad spectrum of antitrust issues involving industries that include auto parts, gasoline, distribution, food products, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and tobacco. She has extensive experience in class and individual litigation, governmental investigations, and price-fixing, price discrimination, monopolization, IP, distribution, tying, and exclusive dealing matters. Michelle co-coordinates the Firm’s practice involving application of antitrust law to IP issues. Per Chambers USA, clients laud Michelle, most recently as "fantastic," and a lawyer who is "very focused, understands [their] business really well and gives very practical advice.

Distinctions

Linked authors

Jones Day (Frankfurt)
Jones Day (Washington)
Jones Day (Brussels)
Jones Day (Brussels)
Jones Day (Paris)

Articles

4010 Bulletin

Craig A. Waldman, Michael A. Gleason, Peter Julian, Jeremy P. Morrison, Michelle K. Fischer The US FTC proposes an unprecedented rule banning most employer/employee noncompete clauses

76

In early January 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) proposed an unprecedented rule banning most employer/employee non-compete clauses. As detailed below, the rule is not likely to take effect for at least eight months, and possibly longer (if ever), given the likelihood of challenges to (...)

Matthew Bull, Michelle K. Fischer The Australian Competition Authority commences proceedings against a wholesale distributor of cycling and sporting products for resale price maintenance (FE Sports)

242

A new ACCC resale price maintenance case provides a timely reminder that manufacturers and suppliers must tread carefully with distribution arrangements related to price in Australia. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ("ACCC") has commenced proceedings against FE Sports, (...)

Katherine M. Brockmeyer, Michelle K. Fischer, Kathryn M. Fenton The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirms directed verdict following a rare price discrimination trial (Spartan Concrete Products / Argos USVI)

234

Failure to show antitrust injury proved fatal to price discrimination claims as the Third Circuit affirmed a directed verdict in favor of cement company, Argos USVI, in a case brought by its customer, ready-mix concrete company Spartan Concrete Products ("Spartan"). This decision highlights (...)

Geoffrey D. Oliver, Kathryn M. Fenton, Matt Evans, Michelle K. Fischer, Peter J. Wang The US FTC and DOJ publish the proposed antitrust guidelines for international enforcement and cooperation

256

The Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice have published for public comment proposed Antitrust Guidelines for International Enforcement and Cooperation ("2016 Proposed Guidelines"). This would be the third iteration of international enforcement guidelines, following the (...)

Bruce McDonald, David P. Wales, John M. Majoras, Kathryn M. Fenton, Michelle K. Fischer, Ryan C. Thomas, Stephen J. Squeri The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division considers individual civil enforcement actions against executives implicated in corporate wrongdoing (Yates Memo)

169

This article has been nominated for the 2016 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division will consider individual civil enforcement actions against executives implicated in corporate wrongdoing, (...)

Geoffrey D. Oliver, Kevin D. McDonald, Michelle K. Fischer The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit renders a split decision regarding sham patent litigation (Tyco Healthcare / Mutual Pharmaceutical)

226

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has remanded for further consideration antitrust claims accusing a patent holder of filing a sham infringement suit and a sham citizen petition with the Federal Drug Administration. The case is Tyco Healthcare Group LP v. Mutual Pharmaceutical (...)

Brian Grube, Michelle K. Fischer, Paula W. Render, Thomas Demitrack A US Federal Appeals Court reaffirms flexible legal standard for restraints in competitor collaborations (Sulfuric acid antitrust litigation)

186

This article has been nominated for the 2014 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. A new decision by a U.S. federal judge and leading antitrust scholar has reaffirmed the U.S. antitrust principle that competitive restraints adopted to foster (...)

Michelle K. Fischer, Paula W. Render, Thomas Demitrack A US Federal Court of Appeals reaffirms flexible legal standard for restraints in competitor collaborations (Ohio Chemical Services / Falconbridge)

77

A new decision by a U.S. federal judge and leading antitrust scholar has reaffirmed the U.S. antitrust principle that competitive restraints adopted to foster competitor collaborations will not be summarily condemned under the per se rule, but instead evaluated under a rule of reason analysis (...)

David Maiorana, Geoffrey D. Oliver, Kenneth R. Adamo, Michelle K. Fischer The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limits patent misuse doctrine and distinguishes it from antitrust violation (Princo)

1156

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision with significant implications for the doctrine of patent misuse. The decision issued last week overturns part of a Federal Circuit panel decision last year holding that Philips may have committed patent misuse by (...)

Michelle K. Fischer, Thomas Demitrack The US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit holds that a seller’s discount program that is available to competing purchasers does not violate the Robinson-Patman Act (Smith Wholesale / R.J.R Tobacco)

873

The Robinson-Patman Act has given rise to some truly awful court decisions that have created a seller-buyer environment of sometimes unforgiving price rigidity, as well as complex and difficult-to-comply-with principles about when and to whom sellers must offer price discounts and nonprice (...)

Michelle K. Fischer, Thomas Demitrack The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit validates cigarettes manufacturer’s discount program and holds that it does not constitute a violation of the Robinson-Patman Act (R.J.R. Tobacco / Cigarettes Cheaper)

515

The Robinson-Patman Act has given rise to some truly awful court decisions that have created a seller-buyer environment of sometimes unforgiving price rigidity, as well as complex and difficult-to-comply-with principles about when and to whom sellers must offer price discounts and nonprice (...)

430 Review

Send a message