Malik Idri
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Paris)
Partner
Malik Idri is a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. His practice focuses on French and European competition law, on both transactional and litigation cases: merger control, antitrust litigation before the French Competition Authority and the European Commission, as well as litigation cases before the administrative courts and State aid. Malik Idri specializes in cases of abuse of dominant position with a particular focus on the telecommunication sector. He dedicated his doctoral thesis to the opening up of competition of the French phone network and he worked at the French sector regulator (ARCEP). He also has advised SFR on a number of litigation matters including the Orange’s sentence to pay the highest fine ever imposed by the French competition authority for abuse of dominant position. Malik spent seven years at Clifford Chance where he also developed a deep knowledge of the distribution sector, in particular on suppliers and distributors’ relationships and private enforcement cases. Malik regularly lectures at ESSEC, from which he is also a graduate, and has published several articles in legal journals.
Linked authors
Anna Aryankalayil
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Washington)
Jennifer Clarke-Smith
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Washington)
Eileen M. Cole
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Washington)
Marie-Laure Combet
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Paris)
Andrew Cook
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (Washington)
2524 | Events
Articles
1913 Bulletin
92
On 1 June 2023, the EU Commission has announced the adoption of updated Horizontal Block Exemption Regulations on Research and Development (R&D) and Specialization agreements (HBERs) and revised Horizontal Guidelines. HBERs exclude certain horizontal agreements from the scope of Art. (...)
1779
Introduction to national case laws: Overview of the European Union case-law An indication of the different aspects that the concept of sport involves, and its consequences over the legal rules to be applied, has been given by the European Court of Justice in 1974. At this occasion, a strict (...)
42
On 18 April 2014, VimpelCom announced that it and Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. (GTH) had signed a share purchase agreement for the sale by GTH of a 51% interest in Orascom Telecom Algérie (OTA), which includes Djezzy, the largest mobile-phone operator in Algeria, to the Fonds National (...)
12120 Review
2865
The last months were probably amongst the most profuse in landmark judgments since the inauguration of this column in 2016. There are no less than four judgments of the Court of Justice, four judgments of the Court of Cassation and one judgment of the Council of State! None of them is (...)
1867
The last months are marked marked by an important judgment of the Court of Justice, which deals with the application ratione temporis of the provisions resulting from the Damages Directive and the previous civil law, as well as the starting point of the statute of limitations (the Volvo – DAF (...)
2182
The last months are marked by two important judgments of the Court of Justice, one on international jurisdiction (Volvo case), the other on the liability of the subsidiary for infringements committed by its parent company (Sumal case). A series of judgments on the conflict of laws in time (...)
2352
The period under review confirms, as in the previous period, the growth of litigation before the administrative courts. It also confirms the importance of certain recurring issues, such as the statute of limitations, international jurisdiction, and compensation for the prejudicial effect of (...)
2854
The abuse of a collective dominant position and the underlying theory of tacit collusion have remained of a delicate use despite some clarifications from the General Court of the European Union. This paper discusses the three criteria defined in the Airtours decision of 2002, their general (...)
Statistics
16557
1655.5
10
Author's ranking
971th
In number of contributions
627th
In number of visits
1651th
In average number of visits