Lipka Jurav is an Associate at Gide Loyrette Nouel in their Prague office.
3969
By its decision of 26 September 2006 the Regional Court in Brno rejected the appeal filed by Telefónica O2 Czech Republic, a. s., formerly “Ceský Telecom”, against the decision of the Chairman of the Office for the Protection of Competition from the end of 2005 whereby the company was imposed (...)
3648
The Czech Office for the Protection of Competition (the “Office”) decided to discontinue administrative proceedings against Telefónica O2 Czech Republic, a.s. (“Telefónica”), formally CESKÝ TELECOM, a.s., which were undertaken on the ground of a possible violation of national and European (...)
2532
On 22 March 2006 the Chairman of the Czech Competition Office imposed a fine in the amount of 80 million CZK upon Ceský Telecom, a.s. (“CT”), the Czech telecommunications operator, for an abuse of its dominant position, in violation of Article 11 of the Czech Competition Act, on the market : (...)
4732
In this contribution we provide a summary of the decision issued on 22 December 2005 by the Slovak Anti-monopoly Office (“Office”) whereby the Office held that several provisions of the Rules of professional conduct for Attorneys (“Rules”) issued by the Slovak Bar Association breached Slovak (...)
3741
By its decision of 24 November 2005, the Czech Office’s Chairman confirmed the Office’s first-instance decision and (i) imposed a fine of 205 million CZK on Èeský Telecom a.s. (which is since July 2005 controlled by a Spanish company, Téléfonica) (“CT”) for having abused its dominant position (...)
2590
In this contribution we provide a summary of the Office’s first instance decision authorising an acquisition of an insurance company, Èeská podnikatelská pojiš ovna, a.s. (“CPP”), by another one, Kooperativa, pojiš ovna, a.s.(“Kooperativa”). The Office received a request by Kooperativa to (...)
5748
This contribution provides a summary of the Czech Competition Office first-instance and appellate decisions addressing the limits to the right to privacy in the context of the Office’s investigation conducted in the business premises of an undertaking suspected of having infringed competition (...)
