Juha Vesala

IPR University Center (Helsinki), University of Lapland
Lecturer

Juha Vesala is a Lecturer at the University of Lapland and the Co-Director of the IPR University Center, based in Helsinki. Vesala is a graduate of the Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki and holds a Master of Laws degree from the University of Minnesota Law School. From 2003 he has taught and conducted research on antitrust law and intellectual property law at the Department of Private Law, University of Helsinki. At first, in a project of the Academy of Finland he published articles and a study on the regulation of anti-circumvention technologies in international, U.S. and E.C. copyright law. Currently, he is preparing a doctoral thesis on selected U.S. and E.C. antitrust issues in the licensing of technology. On those issues, he has also published articles and given presentations at international conferences. Moreover, while on leave from the University, he worked as Senior Research Officer at the Cartels Unit of the Finnish Competition Authority (2006 and 2008). Earlier, he was a Lawyer Trainee at the European Patent Office (2002). He joined the TTLF in April 2008.

Linked author

University of Lapland

Articles

5356 Bulletin

Juha Vesala The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismisses claims of anti-competitive exclusion of positioning technology from standards (Trueposition / Ericsson)

161

U.S. District Court dismisses claims of anti-competitive exclusion of positioning technology from standards* On 6 January 2012 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted motions to dismiss claims that manufacturers of mobile telecommunications products conspired (...)

Juha Vesala The US District Court for the Southern District of New York dismisses an antitrust suit brought against transactions on the market for licenses of mobile wireless-related patents (Siti / AST)

151

Antitrust suit against defensive patent purchasing organization dismissed* On 29 December 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed an antitrust suit brought by Siti-Sites.com, Inc. (“Siti”) against Allied Security Trust (“AST”) and allegedly associated entities (...)

Juha Vesala The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland grants motion for summary judgment on claims of maintaining a monopoly in the operating systems market (Novell / Microsoft)

195

U.S. District Court dismisses Novell’s claims against Microsoft* On 30 March 2010 the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland granted Microsoft’s motion for summary judgment on Novell’s claims that Microsoft violated U.S. antitrust laws by engaging in anti-competitive conduct in order to (...)

Juha Vesala The US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania allows the reverse payment suits to proceed when finding that the agreements extended beyond the scope of the concerned patent (Cephalon)

217

U.S. District Court allows Provigil reverse payment suits to proceed* On 29 March 2010 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania rejected defendants’ motions to dismiss in suits concerning reverse payment settlements between the brand name manufacturer of the (...)

Juha Vesala The US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia grants defendants’ motions to dismiss antitrust claims submitted by the FTC regarding reverse payments settlements and related commercial arrangements (Androgel)

221

U.S. District Court dismisses AndroGel reverse payment antitrust claims* On 22 February 2010 the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta Division) granted defendants’ motions to dismiss antitrust claims brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) among others that (...)

Juha Vesala The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirms judgment that incompatibility of products did not constitute monopolization on the market for pulse oximetry monitors (Tyco Health)

163

U.S. 9th Circuit affirms judgment that incompatibility of products did not constitute monopolization* On 6 January 2010 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed a U.S. District Court (Central District of California) grant of summary judgment on a monopoly maintenance claim (...)

Juha Vesala The US District Court for the Southern District of New York dismisses antitrust claims raised by a distributor of compatible mainframe computers produced by the plaintiff (IBM / T3 Technologies)

171

U.S. District Court dismisses T3’s antitrust claims against IBM* On 30 September 2009 the U.S. District Court of S.D.N.Y. granted in International Business Machines Corp. v. Platform Solutions, Inc. and T3 Technologies, Inc. (No. 06 Civ. 13565(LAK)) IBM’s motion for summary judgment on antitrust (...)

Juha Vesala The US DoJ files an amicus brief on reverse payment settlements on the market for broad-spectrum antimicrobial medicines (Arkansas Carpenters Health / Bayer / Hoechst / Watson)

277

U.S. DOJ files amicus brief on reverse payment settlements* On 6 July 2009 the U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief in a reverse payment settlement case on appeal before the 2nd Circuit (In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation). The filing is in response of an (...)

Send a message