Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington)

John H. Lyons

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Washington)
Lawyer (Partner)

John H. Lyons represents clients in connection with antitrust aspects of mergers and acquisitions, government civil non-merger investigations, litigation and corporate compliance counseling. He has handled matters in a wide range of industries but has particular experience in the application of the antitrust laws to electric utilities, oil and gas companies, and financial exchanges. John holds a J.D. from the American University Washington College of Law.

Distinctions

Linked authors

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (London)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (New York)
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (Brussels)

Articles

1909 Bulletin

Clifford H. Aronson, John H. Lyons, Matthew P. Hendrickson The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denies the FTC’s bid to prevent company from acquiring its alleged potential competitor (Steris / Synergy Health)

206

On September 24, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denied the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) bid to enjoin Steris Corporation (Steris) from acquiring its alleged potential competitor, Synergy Health plc (Synergy). The loss breaks a string of victories in merger (...)

Clifford H. Aronson, John H. Lyons, Kenneth Schwartz, Maria Raptis, Matthew P. Hendrickson, Steven C. Sunshine The US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denies the Federal Trade Commission’s bid to enjoin a company from acquiring its alleged potential competitor (Steris / Synergy)

217

This article has been nominated for the 2016 Antitrust Writing Awards. Click here to learn more about the Antitrust Writing Awards. On September 24, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denied the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) bid to enjoin Steris Corporation (...)

Clifford Mike Naeve, John Estes, John H. Lyons, Tara S. Emory The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upholds the District Court’s judgment and holds for the first time that the filed rate doctrine can bar private claims related to market-based rates that arise from regulated auctions (Simon / KeySpan)

1054

On September 20, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed KeySpan’s victory in Simon v. KeySpan, holding for the first time that the filed rate doctrine can bar private claims related to market-based rates that arise from regulated auctions. While the Court (...)

Statistics


1909
Total visits

381.8
Number of readings per contribution

5
Number of contributions

Author's ranking
1796th
In number of contributions
3299th
In number of visits
4824th
In average number of visits
Send a message